![]() |
johnny gill "fairweather friend" |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 12> |
Author | ||
edtop40 ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 29 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 26 August 2006 at 9:35am |
|
pat
my cassingle issued as motown 2049 contains a non-described version which is the same as the full cd/lp version and it runs 4:35.....the db states all cds contain the "lp version", which in this case is the same as the cassingle version.....you might want to make the same notes as with the song "my, my, my" by johhny gill.... |
||
edtop40
|
||
![]() |
||
Todd Ireland ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 16 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 23 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Is anyone aware of a shorter radio edit that might exist for "Fairweather Friend"?
|
||
![]() |
||
jimct ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 07 April 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Todd: We got 2 different Promo CD singles into the station for this:
(CD45-18379) 1-(listed time 4:35; actual time 4:34) (CD45-1026) 1-Radio Remix (listed time 6:59; actual time 4:57) 2-12" Remix (7:52; 7:49) 3-Hard Core Mix (6:20; 6:22) 4-7" Remix (4:35; 4:33) 5-Extended Edit (5:59; 5:55) 6-Dub Remix (6:18; 6:11) FYI, track 4 on the 6-track promo is NOT the same version as the one found on CD45-18379. One second in, for track 4, I hear a full-volume female vocal "UHHH", which does not appear on the CD45-18379 version. To answer your question, Todd, it does not appear so, despite the (2:02) timing mishap for the 6-track promo's opening cut. |
||
![]() |
||
Todd Ireland ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 16 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 23 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Cha-ching! Outstanding information as always, Jim! Judging by the track listing, the CD45-1026 promo CD appears to have been primarily catered for rhythmic/dance and urban radio stations. Did your station play any of the tracks on that disc, Jim?
|
||
![]() |
||
jimct ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 07 April 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
No, Todd. We took one look at the long times, and had no use for it. If they had put the CORRECT time on Track 1, we would've given it a listen - I just noticed this (2:02) time difference today - obviously WAY too late to help Johnny with radio airplay!
Edited by jimct |
||
![]() |
||
Todd Ireland ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 16 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 23 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Yes, it appears the record label was very careless with its incorrect run time listing for Track 1 on your promo CD copy of "Fairweather Friend", Jim! Chances are that other radio stations around the country also declined to play the song due to the erroneously inflated time listing. It makes me wonder if this had a negative impact on national airplay signficant enough to contribute to the song's disappointing #28 peak on the Billboard Hot 100! Historically, record labels are much more likely to deliberately list a much shorter run time for a song to enourage radio station airplay.
|
||
![]() |
||
aaronk ![]() Admin Group ![]() Joined: 16 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 124 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
It's possible; however... 1) the record promoters were (or should have been) pushing the song, and 2) it did hit the top 40, therefore, a good PD/MD would have at least put the CD in to listen to it. If they liked it enough to listen all the way through, they would've realized the time was wrong. Even if it had actually run over six minutes, any station with a reel-to-reel and cart machine could've made their own edit. I don't think run times discourage a station from playing a record, especially if it's a bonafide hit. Look at "American Pie" as an example. While you could argue that a long run time may discourage a PD from even giving it a listen in the first place, I would argue that a he/she could press the stop button at any moment while previewing it. |
||
![]() |
||
jimct ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 07 April 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
||
![]() |
||
aaronk ![]() Admin Group ![]() Joined: 16 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 124 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I'm not saying that programmers who passed on the song were not good. I'm saying that a good PD/MD would have at least given it a listen and not just thrown the single in the trash without hearing it first.
Exactly my point. You had already heard the song and decided it was not worthy of adding. The thing I was trying to say is that even if the run time had been correct, top 40 programmers and audiences just didn't like the song enough for it to become a huge hit. Edited by aaronk |
||
![]() |
||
aaronk ![]() Admin Group ![]() Joined: 16 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 124 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I'm sorry, Jim. When I made my post, I had not noticed that you typed this message above. I was not trying to say that you weren't good programmers. The point is that you had already heard the song (prior to receiving the remixes), and you had already determined that your station was not going to play it. My argument is simply that long run times don't necessarily prevent a song from becoming a big radio hit. If it's a great song, radio will play the long version or shorten it themselves. |
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 12> |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |