|
Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young-"Ohio" |
Post Reply 
|
Page 12> |
| Author | |
jimct 
Music Fan 
Joined: 07 April 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply
 Topic: Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young-"Ohio"Posted: 04 April 2007 at 4:19am |
|
My commercial 45, which is mono, has a listed time of (3:00), but an actual time of (2:56).
|
|
 |
|
|
sriv94
Music Fan
Joined: 16 September 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 April 2007 at 8:27am |
|
Hmmmm. My So Far CD version runs (3:05). Is it an early fade, a small edit, and/or a speed difference that accounts for the difference? The song sounds slow on my CD, but that doesn't mean that it is.
|
|
|
Doug
--------------- All of the good signatures have been taken. |
|
|
|
|
Todd Ireland
Music Fan
Joined: 16 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 18 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 22 May 2009 at 8:12pm |
|
Am I correct that Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young's "Ohio" was a 45 only release in 1970 and didn't surface on an LP until four years later on the group's So Far compilation? I too am curious as to what accounts for the time difference between the 45 and the CD appearances. I agree with Doug that "Ohio" sounds a bit slow on CD, but can anyone verify if there is indeed a speed issue?
Edited by Todd Ireland |
|
|
|
|
AndrewChouffi
Music Fan
Joined: 24 September 2005 Status: Offline Points: 3 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 22 May 2009 at 8:26pm |
|
Don't forget the first LP that contained "Ohio" (in stereo) was Super Hits Vol. 5 (released late 1970?) on Atlantic (various artists).
Not sure if it's any longer or shorter than 'So Far' though. Andy |
|
|
|
|
sriv94
Music Fan
Joined: 16 September 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 January 2010 at 7:43pm |
|
The version on Neil Young's "Decade" 2-CD set runs (2:58), and sounds a lot faster than the version on "So Far" (can't tell if it's faded earlier--might be by a second or two). That might be the 45 (albeit in stereo rather than mono).
|
|
|
Doug
--------------- All of the good signatures have been taken. |
|
|
|
|
Yah Shure
Music Fan
Joined: 11 December 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 January 2010 at 10:14pm |
|
Doug, I get (2:57) on my BMG-issue Decade set. So that's why they sold it cheaper! :)
My 1970 DJ 45 (Atlantic 2740) times out thusly: Mono side: (2:56) Stereo side: (2:59) The fadeout is essentially at the same point (just an insignificant bit later on the stereo side) so it is a speed difference between the two sides. |
|
|
|
|
eriejwg
Music Fan
Joined: 10 June 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 41 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 January 2010 at 7:51am |
|
There's a digital collection from Neil Young called Neil Young Archives 1963-1972 that contains what's called the 45rpm single of "Ohio" and runs 2:59.
|
|
|
|
|
Yah Shure
Music Fan
Joined: 11 December 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 January 2010 at 6:28pm |
John was kind enough to send me a dub of this digital download, which Amazon calls the "Stereo 45 RPM Single." Its speed matches the stereo side of the DJ 45 almost exactly, and it has an identical fadeout point at the end. One thing I did notice, though: When I folded down each of the two - the 320kb .mp3 download and the vinyl 45 - it was clear that there was more limiting applied to the Archives track (fortunately, though, it isn't brickwalled.) The bottom end and the kick drum lack a lot of the punch that are present on the DJ 45. Here's a look at the A/B comparison, with the Archives track in red at the top, and the vinyl DJ 45 in blue at the bottom. Edited by Yah Shure |
|
|
|
|
JL328
Music Fan
Joined: 06 May 2011 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 22 May 2016 at 8:07am |
|
I've read through this thread as well as the CSN "Woodstock" thread
that has some additional discussion of "Ohio" and am looking for a little clarification... Every appearance of this song on cd is in stereo. Are each of these properly classified as the "dj stereo version" or is there some difference (beyond a couple seconds of timing perhaps) between any of the CD appearances, such as the version on "So Far", and the version that appeared on the stereo side of the promo 45? Second, is the mono version on the commercial 45 (and presumably the mono side of the 45 promo) a fold-down of the stereo promo side (with perhaps some minor fade or speed adjustments)? I've listened to the 45 vs. the version on "So Far" and don't hear any noticeable differences. Thanks for any clarification. Edited by JL328 |
|
|
|
|
aaronk
Admin Group
Joined: 16 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 89 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 22 May 2016 at 4:30pm |
|
I've never compared the 45 to a fold-down of the stereo for "Ohio," but I have for "Suite: Judy Blue Eyes." The latter, to my ears, sounds like a fold-down and edit.
Edited by aaronk |
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
| Tweet |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Topic Options
eriejwg wrote: