Top 40 Music on CD Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Top 40 Music On Compact Disc > Chat Board
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Carpenters-"I Need To Be In Love"
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Carpenters-"I Need To Be In Love"

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
Author
Message
jimct View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 07 April 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jimct Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Carpenters-"I Need To Be In Love"
    Posted: 07 April 2008 at 12:44pm
My commercial 45 has a listed time of (3:25), but an actual time of (3:30).
Back to Top
Yah Shure View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 11 December 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Yah Shure Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 April 2008 at 5:43pm
Jim, the stereo DJ 45 also lists 3:25, but runs 3:30. Unlike the commercial 45, this one is in glorious <cough, cough> CSG stereo. I wonder if Richard might consider a The Carpenters: The CSG Mixes project    ;) ;)
Back to Top
edtop40 View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 29 October 2004
Location: United States
Status: Online
Points: 2
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote edtop40 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 April 2008 at 11:02am
what does "CSG" stand for?

edtop40
Back to Top
jimct View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 07 April 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jimct Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 April 2008 at 11:23am
Ed, my friend, I'm no audiophile, but CSG stood for "Compatible Stereo Generator," and was known in audio circles as the "Haeco-CSG" process. A&M, Atlantic & WB were the primary "record label clients" of this processing, employed from the late 60's, and on through much of the early-to-mid 70's. As stereo stock 45s began to be made, many kids still had those cheap, portable mono turntables. The thinking here was to try to make these "new" stereo 45s "compatible for both mono & stereo turntables", by running the master audio through this CSG process. This was done to try to save the record labels the money, time & trouble that was required to produce a specific mono master for a 45, while still supposedly providing the "full range of sound" on the kids' cheap record players. It was roundly criticized by most audiophiles, who thought the music's sound clearly became distorted/altered going through the CSG audio process. CSG processing, thankfully, has long ago been abandoned. And audiophiles, please, feel free to jump in here - my info here is almost certainly incomplete!
Back to Top
Yah Shure View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 11 December 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Yah Shure Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 April 2008 at 1:24pm
Here's another consideration: When a stereo record was heard in mono, especially on the AM top-40 stations or on mono FM radios in the late '60s-early '70s, the center channel material was louder than the sounds that were hard left or right in the stereo mix. The CSG process was an attempt to reduce the center, bringing it in balance with the hard left/right when heard in mono. In theory, this seemed like a good idea, but in reality, while the mono playback sounded okay, the stereo playback did not sound very good.    

By 1973-76, A & M had pretty much relegated CSG to the stereo side of DJ 45s. If you were to hold a stock and promo 45 of "I Need To Be In Love" next to each other, you'd notice a huge difference in the groove pattern, with the CSG-processed DJ looking much "busier" than the stock copy. In listening to both in stereo, the stock 45 would have a much fuller, more natural-sounding stereo mix than the CSG stereo.

I suppose that an argument could be made that if a top-40 hit was released in promo form as a CSG-processed stereo 45, that should be considered to be the "radio version" mix, but I'm not going down that road.
Back to Top
Hykker View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 30 October 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Hykker Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 April 2008 at 4:53pm
Originally posted by Yah Shure Yah Shure wrote:


By 1973-76, A & M had pretty much relegated CSG to the stereo side of DJ 45s.   In listening to both in stereo, the stock 45 would have a much fuller, more natural-sounding stereo mix than the CSG stereo.



That doesn't make much sense. You'd think AM stations could just play the mono side, and not have to worry about summing errors. By the early 70s many AM stations had installed stereo cartridges in their turntables & summed them to mono, supposedly minimizing the effect.
I don't think I have any A&M 45s in both promo and stock (most likely one or the other), but I'll have to give a listen.

I'm one who's usually pretty sensitive to processing artifacts, but I can't say I ever noticed anything bad-sounding about CSG-processed records, the one exception that comes to mind being "See" by the Rascals, which I always attributed to the song just being mixed that way intentionally.
Back to Top
Roscoe View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 18 July 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Roscoe Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 April 2008 at 6:32pm
Did the 45 of "Please Mr. Postman" use CSG? I believe it was a different mix than the LP version, but that 45 always had a strange, lo-fi sound, especially for a mid-70s recording. The LP version does not have that lo-fi sound.
Back to Top
Yah Shure View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 11 December 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Yah Shure Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 April 2008 at 7:52pm
Hykker, AM stations usually did play the mono side... until the cue burn necessitated a flip. It was the FM stereo listeners, listening in stereo - the very reason for the stereo DJ 45 in the first place - who ended up hearing a weird-sounding, altered stereo mix.      

The mono DJ 45 of "See" doesn't sound great, either; it's quite harsh, with not much bottom end.

Roscoe, yes, the "Please Mr. Postman" promo 45 got the CSG treatment. I don't have a stock copy of that one, so I can't say whether or not they got the same treatment. The stock stereo CSGs on A & M I have were from 1970 (Miguel Rios, Free) with the latest being a '72 Shawn Phillips Christmas 45. A & M used conventional stereo for the majority of the label's promo 45s; The Carpenters seem to be the one act that utilized CSG the most. Here's what I found from those that were handy:

CSG-Processed (on the stereo side) DJ 45s:

1446 "Yesterday Once More"
1468 "Top Of The World"
1646 "Please Mr. Postman"
1721 "Solitaire"
1800 "There's A Kind Of Hush"
1828 "I Need To Be In Love"
1859 "Goofus"
1940 "All You Get From Love Is A Love Song" (both the small-hole and normal-sized hole DJ 45s)


Conventional (Non-CSG-Processed) stereo DJ 45s:

1351 "It's Going To Take Some Time"
1521 "I Won't Last A Day Without You"
1677 "Only Yesterday"
2008 "Sweet Sweet Smile"

   
Back to Top
AndrewChouffi View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 24 September 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 3
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AndrewChouffi Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 April 2008 at 12:04am
If I'm not mistaken, wasn't Free's single mix of "All Right Now" Haeco-CSG processed on the A&M commercial 45, but NOT CSG processed on the stereo side of the DJ edit-of-single-mix 45?

Andy
Back to Top
Yah Shure View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 11 December 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Yah Shure Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 April 2008 at 6:07am
Andy, I don't have the 4:14 DJ 45 of A & M 1206. My copy is the mono/mono edit with the "2:70" stated running time (a warm-up, perhaps, to the 2:98 stated time on the group's 1973 non-charter "Wishing Well" [Island 1212].)

I also have the 1975 non-CSG stereo DJ 45 reissue (A & M 1720) from the Best Of Free LP with a stated time of 3:30.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.07
Copyright ©2001-2024 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.062 seconds.