Top 40 Music on CD Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Top 40 Music On Compact Disc > Chat Board
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Sounds of the 80s 1980-1982
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Sounds of the 80s 1980-1982

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message
995wlol View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 10 December 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 995wlol Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Sounds of the 80s 1980-1982
    Posted: 31 December 2008 at 6:27pm
I just received this CD in the mail (bought it to uprgrade the 45 version of Steve Miller Band's Abracadabra on my VH1 The Big 80's CD, which is quite loud and compressed/maximized).
Well, the version of Abracadabra on the SOT 80s 1980-1982 disk suffers from a loud burst of static from about 0:01 to 0:03. This disk is in absolutely flawless condition, so it appears to be a mastering problem. Does anyone else have this issue? If so, it might be worth noting in the database (I wouldn't have purchased had I known about it).
Back to Top
aaronk View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 124
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote aaronk Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31 December 2008 at 7:31pm
I'm not sure about that disc, but I'm pretty certain "Abracadabra" is just an early fade on the 45. The database states "45 version," but I believe it's one of those cases where Pat chose to use "version" for what I would consider "length." In another thread, Bill also states that the 45 is also sped up quite a bit. That could also be a reason for designating it as "version."

Edited by aaronk
Back to Top
sriv94 View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 16 September 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote sriv94 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31 December 2008 at 9:06pm
Correct on both counts, Aaron. The 45 is an early fade (very early, in fact) and is sped up. Given the over a minute disparity, I'd have no quibble calling it a "version" even if the speeds were the same.

I do have the SOTE disc, but not at my immediate disposal. I'll try to check over the next day or so to see if I have the same issue.

And Happy New Year, one and all!

Edited by sriv94
Doug
---------------
All of the good signatures have been taken.
Back to Top
EdisonLite View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 18 October 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 72
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote EdisonLite Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 January 2009 at 11:30am
I thought that fades and "very early fades" were supposed to be designated as "length". I just checked Addrisi Bros "Slow Dancin'..." in the database, which is a very early fade, faded to 3:12 instead of nearly 6 minutes, and Pat lists this as "version."

This is very confusing to me. And this methodology will cause a lot of people to buy CDs unnecessarily when they can just fade the songs on CDs they already own.

Pat, for our knowledge - when a song fades early, where do you draw the line between "length" and "version" designations - for instance, if a faded song is 2:00 shorter than its album counterpart it's a "version" but if it's faded 1:59 shorter than its album counterpart it's a "length"?? Wherever the random dividing line is drawn, it seems very inconsistent with what you otherwise describe as a "length" in the database. (Or do you just randomly choose the designation and not have a specific time used as the dividing line, which is even more random)?

For me, Pat, your database is helpful in so many ways, but if a song ever fades early (regardless of how many seconds/minutes early), if it gets a "version" designation, it's just confusing.
Back to Top
crapfromthepast View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan
Avatar

Joined: 14 September 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 40
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote crapfromthepast Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 January 2009 at 1:00pm
I listened to my copy of Sounds Of The Eighties - 1980-1982, and I don't hear any obvious static or noise on the intro to "Abracadabra".

Here's a test you can run - Google the program called Exact Audio Copy, or EAC. It's a free audio extraction tool, and it's the favorite of audiophiles because of its ability to extract accurately and report when there may be possible errors. Download the program, use the default settings to get you started, and see if "Abracadabra" puts up a fight. I'm willing to bet that there are some errors at the beginning of your CD.

(If all else fails, let me know and I'll send you a dub from my CD. That CD is my preferred source for "Abracadabra".)
Back to Top
aaronk View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 124
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote aaronk Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 January 2009 at 1:10pm
Originally posted by EdisonLite EdisonLite wrote:

... do you just randomly choose the designation and not have a specific time used as the dividing line, which is even more random?

We've argued this before, and I'm with you, Gordon. It's very confusing when the database randomly chooses which early fades are considered "versions." There are even instances in the database where a song fades only a matter of seconds earlier, but it still gets a "version" designation, because the full song ends cold.

"We Are The World" is another example of an early fade that is designated as "version," because there are soloists that are not featured earlier in the song. Again, it's very arbitrary, and there are no definite rules as to how the "length" and "version" designators are applied to early fades.
Back to Top
995wlol View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 10 December 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 995wlol Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 January 2009 at 1:36pm
I've probably read nearly all of the posts involving the "length" vs "version" argument, but haven't chimed in yet, so here I go. It seems that there are quite a large number of forum members (myself included) that utilize audio editing software to create early fades and edits from LP versions already in their collections. Due to this fact, it seems like the "45 length" designation would be much more useful to those members, regardless whether any lyrics or unique audio occur after the fade, which doesn't seem particularly important when tracking down a version since most people are already familiar with the given version they are searching for. Personally, I would love to see a third designation in addition to "45 version" and "45 length" called something like "45 mix." This would tell me that I can neither fade nor edit the LP version to recreate the "single" version. Of course I know that this is easy for me to throw out there since I'm not the one maintaining the database :-) Just my two cents.
Back to Top
aaronk View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 124
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote aaronk Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 January 2009 at 2:57pm
I think it's one of those things that would be too much work to go back and change at this point. What bothers me is that there is not a rule that can be applied to determine "length" vs "version" for early fades. Not having a rule also makes it very inconsistent. For instance, "Owner Of A Lonely Heart" by Yes gets a "45 length" designation; however, you could argue that there is a key change at the end with different lyrics that are not on the 45 and thus should be a "version."
Back to Top
Todd Ireland View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 16 October 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 23
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Todd Ireland Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 January 2009 at 4:19pm
Originally posted by 995wlol 995wlol wrote:

Personally, I would love to see a third designation in addition to "45 version" and "45 length" called something like "45 mix." This would tell me that I can neither fade nor edit the LP version to recreate the "single" version.


Actually, Pat does use "45 mix" and "LP mix" notations in the database on occasion, such as for the Beatles' "Yesterday" and Badfinger's "Baby Blue". These designations can also be tricky because many times the mix differences between a stereo LP and a mono 45, other than the obvious left-right channel panning, may not be easily noticeable to the casual listener. For instance, a mono mix might consist of slightly louder vocals or feature certain instruments a little more prominently compared to its stereo counterpart. As we delve deeper into more '60s Top 40 hits, I'm sure this issue will become front and center (no pun intended!) for many 45 and LP comparisons.   

Edited by Todd Ireland
Back to Top
Pat Downey View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 01 October 2003
Status: Offline
Points: 1
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Pat Downey Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 January 2009 at 9:20pm
Aaron, thanks for pointing out the lyric change in the longer version of "Owner Of A Lonely Heart". For that reason, I have changed the designation from LP length to LP version in the database.

Originally as I recall, I used a criteria that would automatically warrant a "version" comment if there was 1 minute of additional music on the LP vs the 45.

In the case of "Owner Of A Lonely Heart" even though there isn't a 1 minute difference of time, there is that additional lyric that warrants a "version" designation.

If you come across any other circumstances similar to "Owner Of A Lonely Heart", point them out to me and I will change the designation.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.07
Copyright ©2001-2024 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.047 seconds.