Top 40 Music on CD Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Top 40 Music On Compact Disc > Chat Board
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Gary Glitter - "Rock And Roll Part 2"
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Gary Glitter - "Rock And Roll Part 2"

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message
crapfromthepast View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan
Avatar

Joined: 14 September 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 41
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote crapfromthepast Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Gary Glitter - "Rock And Roll Part 2"
    Posted: 05 March 2010 at 7:44pm
I thought doing comparisons for this track would be relatively simple. Nope. At the very least, the designation of "45 length" and "LP length" need to be changed.

First I played my US 45 (Bell 45,237, Part 2 has printed 3:10, actual 3:10). It's mono on both sides.

Then assembled all 7 versions I have on CD to figure out what's what. It still doesn't quite make sense.

I found what I think are three different stereo mixes on CD, none of which really sound like the mono 45, and it's really difficult to describe them.

The first version to appear on CD was DCC's Toga Rock II (1989, mastered by Steve Hoffman). Very boomy drums, lots of processing on the vocals. Big delay in the vocals between L and R channels - R comes in first. (Listen to just the L channel vocals, and it's sounds like everything comes in just a little late.)

This same version crops up again (but doesn't sound quite as good) on Mystic Music Presents Good Times (1991), Time-Life's Sounds Of The Seventies - 1972 Take Two (1991) and Madacy's Rock On - 1972 (1996).

There's another, more dry mix on Time-Life's Guitar Rock - 1972-1973 (1994), which sounds like it has essentially no reverb on anything, especially when compared with the Toga Rock mix. The vocals have a lot less processing. It has slightly exaggerated highs, which leads me to think that it may be a clone of Rhino's 1991 Greatest Hits CD, and the sample I heard on Amazon confirms this.

And finally, there's the version on Rhino's Have A Nice Day Vol. 9, which doesn't match any of the above. The claps in the clap track are panned completely to the R channel and have a very different tone than all the others, and it's not an EQ difference. The vocals are panned hard right as well, with just a small amount of leakage into the L channel. What the heck?

And to complicate matters, none of the above three mixes really matches the 45. I guess Toga Rock comes closest, but there are still some differences in the effects used on the vocals, plus the 45 extends about 10 seconds beyond the end of the Toga Rock version.

I repeated the same exercise with the B-side, "Part 1" (which is the same song but with vocals). The 45 has vocals that sound kinda natural, while the version on Disky's Beat Goes On Vol. 3 (1997) has lots of processing that make the vocals sound kinda metallic.

I give up. :(
Back to Top
Yah Shure View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 11 December 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Yah Shure Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 March 2010 at 8:46pm
Don't you dare give up, Ron! Your volume-by-volume HAND dissection on the Steve Hoffman boards is much appreciated.

Unfortunately, the DJ 45 is of no additional help here, since both sides are the mono Part 2.
Back to Top
crapfromthepast View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan
Avatar

Joined: 14 September 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 41
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote crapfromthepast Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 March 2010 at 8:50pm
Anyone have the Bell LP? Or UK 45/LP?
Back to Top
eriejwg View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan
Avatar

Joined: 10 June 2007
Location: United States
Status: Online
Points: 53
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote eriejwg Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 March 2010 at 8:29pm
Is the 45 a dedicated mono mix or a fold down?
Back to Top
aaronk View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 128
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote aaronk Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 March 2010 at 10:27am
I always thought it was a dedicated mix, as the CD versions I have do not fold down to sound like the mono. It seems there needs to be some further sorting of the various CD versions, though. Thanks for your new details, Ron!
Back to Top
Roscoe View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 18 July 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Roscoe Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 March 2010 at 1:09pm
Originally posted by crapfromthepast crapfromthepast wrote:


I give up. :(


If you're referring to finding the best sounding "45 version" on CD, then that may indeed be an exercise in futility, unless it surfaces on an obscure import CD. For whatever reason, the longer 45 mix seems to have gone MIA in the CD era. Given this tune's resurrection as a sporting event anthem in the 90s, it is surprising that no one has issued the true 45 version on CD...maybe a case of missing tapes?

In any event, the analysis you have performed thus far is interesting and confirms my strategy of sticking with a needledrop of the 45.
Back to Top
Santi Paradoa View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan
Avatar

Joined: 17 February 2009
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 22
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Santi Paradoa Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 March 2010 at 10:56am
BTW, Gary's only other US top 40 hit is on a third CD that is currently not in Pat's database. "I Didn't Know I Loved You" can be found on Sounds Of The Seventies - AM Heavy Hits (Time-Life SOD-37).
Santi Paradoa

Miami, Florida
Back to Top
aaronk View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 128
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote aaronk Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 November 2010 at 8:27pm
The database was never updated to reflect Ron's findings, and I don't think
we ever determined which version appears on the US LP.
Back to Top
mainrhythm View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 30 August 2010
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote mainrhythm Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 November 2010 at 11:25pm
My LP has a printed time of 3:00 for Part 2. I will have to compare it to my 45 tomorrow.

edit: wow, the 45 sounds terrible. The LP version is stereo, has an actual time of 2:59 and sounds great.

Edited by mainrhythm
Back to Top
aaronk View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 128
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote aaronk Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 November 2010 at 8:01pm
Mainrhythm just sent me a dub of his vinyl LP, and it sounds like the same mix that is on the "Have A Nice Decade" box set. This is not the same stereo mix found on "Have A Nice Day, Vol. 9." I agree with Ron that the clap tracks have a different tone between these two mixes. When I have a chance, I'll also pull out my copy on "Those Rockin' 70s" to see if it matches any of the other versions I have.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.07
Copyright ©2001-2024 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.063 seconds.