![]() |
James Brown-"It’s A Man’s Man’s Man’s..." |
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
| Author | |
jimct
Music Fan
Joined: 07 April 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: James Brown-"It’s A Man’s Man’s Man’s..."Posted: 14 May 2010 at 11:56am |
|
My commercial 45 (confirmed as King 6035, is vinyl, with deadwax of "101-A (-7) K12097") has a listed time of (2:52) and an actual time of (2:53). I only post this info because every current decent-quality database CD that includes the original recording of this song runs either (2:45) or (2:46), including the normally-quite-reliable, Hip-O Select Singles series! It has been previously discussed that Brown would, more than any other artist, re-mix/re-release a 2nd 45 version of his current hits, with either "less of this" or "more of that". Perhaps the version of this song on my 45 is either, 1) such a second mix, which has eluded all previous CD compilers/researchers or, 2) just another case where a different tape was wrongly thought to be the correct hit 45 master. Anybody else with an original King 6035 45 out there?
Edited by jimct |
|
![]() |
|
Gary Mack
Music Fan
Joined: 06 February 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 May 2010 at 6:51am |
|
Mine sayeth 2:52, it runs 2:53 and reads "101-A (-2) K-12097 LH X-4603".
GM |
|
![]() |
|
Todd Ireland
Music Fan
Joined: 16 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 23 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 May 2010 at 9:08am |
|
Thanks for the info on this, Jim and Gary. I'm also wondering if perhaps the time discrepency between your 45 and the commercial CD appearances could at least partially be explained by a pitch difference?
|
|
![]() |
|
Gary Mack
Music Fan
Joined: 06 February 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 May 2010 at 6:39pm |
My Technics turntable has a strobe pitch control and I'm always careful to set it properly. GM |
|
![]() |
|
Yah Shure
Music Fan
Joined: 11 December 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 May 2010 at 9:23pm |
|
Gary, I think Todd meant the differences in mastering speeds (as opposed to "pitch") between the 45 and CD, not your turntable's speed.
I have two copies of the commercial 45, but they differ in appearance. The labels are the same, but although King had its own onsite manufacturing facilities, one copy (#1) has a higher quality vinyl content than the other (#2) which has King's more typically hissy cheap plastic. #1 also has a raised lip around the record's edge on both sides, while the edges on #2 are flat. Copy #1's deadwax info is almost identical to Jim's copy: "101-A (-7) K-12097". The difference is the hyphen in that last number. Copy #2's deadwax is closer to Gary's copy, but differs: "101-A (-2) K-12097 LH". There's no "X-4603" (or anything else) following the "LH". Both #1 and #2 are (2:52) listed and (2:54) actual. To be even more precise, copy 1 runs (2:54.315) and #2 runs (2:54.319). It doesn't get much closer than that. Edited by Yah Shure |
|
![]() |
|
Todd Ireland
Music Fan
Joined: 16 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 23 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 May 2010 at 9:43pm |
Yes, that's what I meant. |
|
![]() |
|
jimct
Music Fan
Joined: 07 April 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 May 2010 at 10:20pm |
|
|
![]() |
|
Robert
Music Fan
Joined: 04 March 2006 Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 May 2010 at 9:13am |
|
Mine also has a raised lip but deadwax # 101-A (-5) K-12097.
|
|
![]() |
|
edtop40
Music Fan
Joined: 29 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 13 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 January 2013 at 5:32pm |
|
this is very odd fellows!!....my commercial 45 for the
james brown song 'it's a man's man's man's world' issued as king 6035 states the run time on the label as 2:52 but actually runs 2:46 and matches my cdr version perfectly....the run out groove info is '101-A (-4) K- 12097'.....if anyone wants a copy for their review send me a pm and i will forward them a copy... Edited by edtop40 |
|
|
edtop40
|
|
![]() |
|
MMathews
Music Fan
Joined: 18 August 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 March 2017 at 3:14pm |
|
Ah just remembered to update this thread... I can answer
the ages old question about the times for this song: the only difference between the (2:46) singles and the (2:53) - (2:54) singles is the pitch. So just slow down any of the CD sources and you got it. The pitch change is drastic, almost a full semi-tone. I can add that once I heard it this way, the slower speed sounds like the actual recording speed and the faster speed sounds unnatural. MM |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
| Tweet |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |