![]() |
Three Dog Night - "One" |
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
| Author | |
Roscoe
Music Fan
Joined: 18 July 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: Three Dog Night - "One"Posted: 12 February 2012 at 5:31pm |
|
I thought for sure there would be an existing thread on
this but a search didn't turn up anything: There's an active thread on the Steve Hoffman forum about the mono 45 version of Three Dog Night's "One" and a poster indicates that he folded the version from the "Celebrate" set to mono and that it matched his mono 45 with no discernable mix differences. I tried the same thing and got the same result: the only differences I heard between my 45 and a fold-down of the Celebrate version were the typical Dunhill eq and compression (also the 45 fades early). But the database listing for this song notes that "the mono 45 has a totally different mix than the LP". I don't completely trust my ears. What are the mix differences that I (and the Hoffman contributor) are missing? |
|
![]() |
|
Pat Downey
Admin Group
Joined: 01 October 2003 Status: Offline Points: 1 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 February 2012 at 8:38pm |
|
First, the Steve Hoffman contributor should compare the 45 to the parent LP which is "Three Dog Night" and not the "Celebrate" hits compilation but in this case it doesn't matter. The 45 is swimming in reverb and there is no stereo cd release that includes this reverb.
|
|
![]() |
|
Bill Cahill
Music Fan
Joined: 27 June 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 8 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 February 2012 at 7:15am |
|
I believe that the key difference between the mono single mix and the stereo LP mix is that during the middle of the song when the music gets mixed out, leaving just the accapella singing of "Celebrate Celebrate Dance to the Music", the drums come back in LATER on the mono 45 version.
|
|
![]() |
|
Yah Shure
Music Fan
Joined: 11 December 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 February 2012 at 8:12am |
|
Bill, "One" word: caffeine. :) "One," not "Celebrate."
|
|
![]() |
|
BillCahill
Music Fan
Joined: 13 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 February 2012 at 1:08pm |
|
Yeah I read it wrong.. sorry. As far as "One" is concerned I agree that the reverb is a major difference.
|
|
![]() |
|
The Hits Man
Music Fan
Joined: 04 February 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 February 2012 at 6:01am |
|
The Chicago horn section is also a bit more prominent on
the "Celebrate" mono single. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
EdisonLite
Music Fan
Joined: 18 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 225 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 September 2015 at 10:38pm |
|
As the LP version is 3:02 and the single version is 2:47 but in mono and with extra reverb, if I were to take the 3:02 version and fade it to 2:47, would that approximate the single version - or is there also edits that make the single the shorter length of 2:47?
|
|
![]() |
|
aaronk
Admin Group
Joined: 16 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 273 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 September 2015 at 5:58am |
|
Gordon: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=avh9Fep_W64
|
|
![]() |
|
Steve Carras
Music Fan
Joined: 29 July 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 September 2015 at 7:50am |
|
Here's the link:
Edited by Steve Carras |
|
|
You know you're really older when you think that younger singer Jesse McCartney's related in anyway to former Beatle Paul McCartney.
|
|
![]() |
|
Steve Carras
Music Fan
Joined: 29 July 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 September 2015 at 8:52pm |
|
BTW Does anyone know why the labels on some, like my copy, and that of one of the posters on that channel were reversed, so Chest Fever's listed oin the A side?
|
|
|
You know you're really older when you think that younger singer Jesse McCartney's related in anyway to former Beatle Paul McCartney.
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
| Tweet |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |