Top 40 Music on CD Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Top 40 Music On Compact Disc > Chat Board
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - lil mo superwoman question for paul haney
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

lil mo superwoman question for paul haney

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
edtop40 View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 29 October 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote edtop40 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: lil mo superwoman question for paul haney
    Posted: 19 February 2013 at 7:48pm
here's one for paul haney at record research regarding the
song superwoman/superwoman pt II by lil mo issued as
eastwest 67171....my top 40 book has both songs as separate
entries...superwoman entered the top 40 on 5-12-01 and
peaked at number 34 for 1 week, then pt II peaked at #11 as
was in the top 40 for 13 weeks.....but...in the hot 100
annual there is no entry in the peak slot of number 34 for
superwoman....why wouldn't that song get it's own
slot....it wasn't just a b-side it was a legitimate a-side
for one week.....any info would be welcomed....
edtop40
Back to Top
mstgator View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 06 September 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote mstgator Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 February 2013 at 9:07pm
It looks like Paul anticipated your inquiry Ed, as this was updated in the 8th
edition of Pop Annual (1955-2011), which does have "Superwoman" at #148
for the year (peak position #34).
Back to Top
aaronk View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 125
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote aaronk Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 February 2013 at 9:22pm
Ed, if my memory is correct, Part 1 began getting airplay on urban radio
stations, but after a couple weeks, they all started playing Part 2.
Rhythmic CHR stations also played Part 2. Without actually looking at
the weekly Billboard charts during the song's chart run, I'm guessing
this was a case where after it made the top 40, they decided Part 2 was
the bona fide hit version and changed the way it was listed. Therefore,
it wasn't really two separate chart runs for Parts 1 and 2. Hopefully Paul
can confirm, but I'm betting the book with Part 1 listed separately is just
an error.
Back to Top
aaronk View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 125
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote aaronk Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 February 2013 at 9:23pm
Originally posted by mstgator mstgator wrote:

It looks like Paul anticipated your inquiry Ed, as
this was updated in the 8th
edition of Pop Annual (1955-2011), which does have "Superwoman" at
#148
for the year (peak position #34).

And it also looks like I'm completely wrong!
Back to Top
mstgator View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 06 September 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote mstgator Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 February 2013 at 6:58pm
Not completely wrong, Aaron... the chart run does in fact seem to back your
theory. "Superwoman" debuted on the Hot 100 on 3/31/01, and steadily
climbed until reaching #34 in it's 7th week. On the chart of 5/19/01, the
listing was changed to "Superwoman Pt. II" featuring Fabolous (with
songwriters and producers also adjusted) as it climbed to #24, but Billboard
linked its previous weeks' positions and total weeks on to the original.
(Something similar happened on the R&B chart, as "Superwoman" made it as
high as #9 before switching to "Superwoman Pt. II" on 5/19 for the remainder
of its run).

So, it looks like Record Research treated the single as one song in the
previous edition of Hot 100 Annual, and as two separate songs in the
latest edition. Either way could be correct depending on your viewpoint.

(And no, I don't work for Record Research, so I'd also welcome Paul to chime
in with the real inside scoop!)

Edited by mstgator
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.07
Copyright ©2001-2024 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.061 seconds.