![]() |
Aerosmith - What It Takes |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <12 |
Author | |
aaronk ![]() Admin Group ![]() Joined: 16 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 165 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Todd, I can send you a copy of the CHR Remix/Edit for comparison purposes.
|
|
![]() |
|
Todd Ireland ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 16 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 23 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I would indeed welcome a copy to compare. Thanks, guys!
|
|
![]() |
|
edtop40 ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 29 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 6 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
my commercial cassingle issued as geffen 19944 states the tracks as below
1-what is takes (remix/edit) (4:06) 2-monkey on my back (lp version) (3:56) todd...i did some more digging on my end and i can confirm that the "remix/edit" version which is on the cassingle is identical to the "chr remix edit" that is on the promo cd single.....hopefully this one is put to rest.... edtop40 |
|
edtop40
|
|
![]() |
|
Todd Ireland ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 16 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 23 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks for all your analysis here, Ed. You're a big help!
|
|
![]() |
|
chendagam ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 27 August 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Any conformation on this yet? |
|
![]() |
|
aaronk ![]() Admin Group ![]() Joined: 16 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 165 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I just A/B'd the version on Big Ones with the CHR Remix/Edit, and nothing is jumping out at me. I'll have to do a more careful listen when time permits, but if I had to make the call right now, I'd say they are the same mix.
|
|
![]() |
|
RichM921 ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 30 October 2007 Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I just heard a version of this song on an old Casey Kasem countdown
where it sounds like a completely different vocal take was used. It had all the typical edit points that I'm used to. Could this be a case of some copies having a completely remixed version and others just have an edit of the album version? |
|
![]() |
|
NightAire ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 20 February 2010 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
After syncing up the CHR remix / edit with the LP version (the edit runs 0.26% faster, likely not intentional), I can confirm that the mixes are identical.
Other than the minimal speed difference, the edit is slightly more compressed. Measuring from the first downbeat to 2 minutes and 33 seconds in (at the beginning of the first edit), I see the average RMS of the edit being -15.2 db. The average RMS of the same section of the LP version is -17.25 db... so approximately 2 db greater peak to average levels on the edit. The tracks used for this comparison are tracks 1 and 2 of the promo CD single Geffen PRO-CD-3852, ripped by Ron. TL;DR - The edit is not a remix, although it is slightly denser than the LP version. The version Rich mentioned above from a Casey Kasem countdown with a different vocal take... I have no knowledge of it. |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <12 |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |