Top 40 Music on CD Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Top 40 Music On Compact Disc > Chat Board
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Simon & Garfunkel-"Bridge Over..."
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Simon & Garfunkel-"Bridge Over..."

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
Message
TomDiehl1 View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 13 January 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TomDiehl1 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 July 2010 at 7:03pm
Many thanks to John for the 45 dub... it's been a long time since I've played the 45.

On a side note, hearing the mono mix again reminds me of my test pressing 45 for Garfunkel's All I Know, which has it's original sleeve with someone's (DJ, label worker, promotion man?) handwriting on it saying "this is the next Bridge Over Troubled Water". The test pressing had the longer "mono" version of the song on both sides, which I thought was pretty cool.
Live in stereo.
Back to Top
aaronk View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 190
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote aaronk Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 July 2010 at 8:58pm
Thanks to John, I just did a side-by-side comparison of the mono 45 and a fold down of the Essential version. This is one case where I'm going to have to disagree about a drastic difference between the two, even though the 45 is a unique mix. Perhaps earlier copies on CD suffer from extra reverb, but I do not hear any extra reverb on the stereo version. In fact, at the end, it's just the opposite. The 45 has the vocals buried and it sounds far more echo-y than the stereo fold down.

I will also argue that the fold down sounds better than the actual 45, particularly at the end. The strings are cranked up way too loud, practically drowning everything else out.
Back to Top
Roscoe View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 18 July 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Roscoe Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 July 2010 at 11:14am
Originally posted by aaronk aaronk wrote:

Thanks to John, I just did a side-by-side comparison of the mono 45 and a fold down of the Essential version. This is one case where I'm going to have to disagree about a drastic difference between the two, even though the 45 is a unique mix. Perhaps earlier copies on CD suffer from extra reverb, but I do not hear any extra reverb on the stereo version. In fact, at the end, it's just the opposite. The 45 has the vocals buried and it sounds far more echo-y than the stereo fold down.

I will also argue that the fold down sounds better than the actual 45, particularly at the end. The strings are cranked up way too loud, practically drowning everything else out.


I tend to agree that the mono BOTW is not a revelation. I do think it's a fine mono mix, but not orders of magnitude different or better than the stereo mix.

Still, I'm glad to have it. I believe I did my needledrop from a "Hall of Fame" reissue 45, which was vinyl and not styrene. I have read elsewhere that the HOF 45s pale in comparison to the Columbia originals, but I can never seem to find originals that are in good enough shape for a needledrop.
Back to Top
Yah Shure View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 11 December 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Yah Shure Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 July 2010 at 6:00pm
I always thought the overpowering strings at the end of the song served as the perfect metaphor: that no matter how strong the currents of the troubled water were raging (and nearly drowning him) Art would still be there as that bridge. The dramatically-overpowering strings make me imagine that the bridge is over Niagara Falls instead of Cripple Creek.

Then again, the Niagara Falls tourism bureau may not have seen the potential humor in any "bride over troubled water" typos. So much for going over-the-top... :)

In any event, the 45 sounded great on AM radio at the time. But I certainly wouldn't say that the mono 45 is anything like a "mono Sgt. Peppers" compared to the stereo mix.

My promo 45 arrived at the college station on January 28, 1970, and the initial HOF reissue on September 30th, meaning that the original BOTW single was available for fewer than eight months. Of course, it sold a boatload during that time, but because of the length and high percentage of styrene pressings, pristine originals can be a tough find.

I was prepared to dig out my original stock, DJ and HOF copies to do a needledrop over the weekend, but the real surprise turned out to be a long-forgotten cutout copy I'd bought in 1970. Part of the fun of cutout 45s was that pressings from other regions of the country besides the usual suspects would often turn up. This particular cutout was an east coast Pitman styrene pressing which I had never played. I captured the virgin spin and it sounded fantastic. The previously-unplayed Terre Haute mono DJ side had more rumble and surface noise. I stopped right there and never even got to the Terre Haute HOF reissue copy.

Edited by Yah Shure
Back to Top
aaronk View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 190
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote aaronk Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 July 2010 at 7:37pm
Originally posted by Yah Shure Yah Shure wrote:

I always thought the overpowering strings at the end of the song served as the perfect metaphor.

I KNEW someone was going to bring that up! I had thought about it myself, even as I was typing my response above. I'm not saying the dislike the mono version, but it's definitely not my preference. I suppose if I had become used to hearing that mix, it probably would be, though.
Back to Top
edtop40 View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 29 October 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 7
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote edtop40 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 July 2013 at 4:39pm
i just did an A/B review of simon & garfunkel's song
'bridge over troubled water' and there are very subtle mix
differences, but NOT enough to warrant a note in the
db......as i usually do, i will chalk this one up to the
innate differences between a stereo deliver of the music
and a mono delivery of the music....as far as i can tell
all the instrumentation are the same on mono mix and stereo
mix.......it's just that because of the format, they sound
different....i go back to what i always say.....when
comparing a stereo version of a song and a mono
version....they don't sound anything alike, because of the
natural differences in the delivery method...
edtop40
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.07
Copyright ©2001-2024 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.043 seconds.