|
"Harvest Moon" - Neil Young |
Post Reply 
|
| Author | |
sriv94 
Music Fan 
Joined: 16 September 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply
 Topic: "Harvest Moon" - Neil YoungPosted: 13 November 2021 at 3:38pm |
|
In case there's no thread on this, I'm creating one now.
There is a US promo of this with apparently a short edit at (3:49), a long edit at (4:56), and the LP version at (5:03). Anyone know what's extracted from the short edit (and for that matter, the long edit)? |
|
|
Doug
--------------- All of the good signatures have been taken. |
|
 |
|
|
eriejwg
Music Fan
Joined: 10 June 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 109 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 November 2021 at 4:37pm |
|
Doug, I only have an mp3 of the short edit but I list the
source as The Greatest Hits. So, it must be recreatable. I'll send the mp3 to you. |
|
|
John Gallagher
Erie, PA Celebrating 28 years as a full-time wedding & special event DJ! |
|
|
|
|
MikeM
Music Fan
Joined: 18 August 2021 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 14 November 2021 at 7:21am |
I have a FLAC version of the Short Edit. |
|
|
|
|
ChicagoBill
Music Fan
Joined: 06 November 2019 Location: Utah Status: Offline Points: 23 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 14 November 2021 at 5:32pm |
|
Doug, isn't it amazing that this not only didn't hit the Top 40, but didn't even hit the Hot 100! Oh well, My
45 RPM single (Reprise 18685, released on 12/12/1992) states the time as 3:49, and indeed runs 3:49. As far as my limited editing skills tell me, if you are working on the L.P. version of 'Harvest Moon', CD Reprise 45057, the single has one edit at 3:07.2 to 4:14.6, or there abouts. I remember in the record store, we tried re- ordering more of the single, 'Harvest Moon' a few weeks later, and WEA/Reprise said it was already discontinued. -Bill. |
|
|
|
|
sriv94
Music Fan
Joined: 16 September 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 14 November 2021 at 6:53pm |
|
Thx, Bill. It sounds a little clunky in that spot, though. I made a smoother edit at (3:22.506) to (4:29.894),
then did a quick fade out from (3:47) to (3:50) and I think it pretty well matches the MP3 John forwarded me. I'll let the judges decide. :) Edited by sriv94 |
|
|
Doug
--------------- All of the good signatures have been taken. |
|
|
|
|
eriejwg
Music Fan
Joined: 10 June 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 109 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 November 2021 at 1:28pm |
|
I ordered the promo CD single today to ensure I have the
proper short edit. I honestly don't remember the edit points or fades and want to be sure. |
|
|
John Gallagher
Erie, PA Celebrating 28 years as a full-time wedding & special event DJ! |
|
|
|
|
ChicagoBill
Music Fan
Joined: 06 November 2019 Location: Utah Status: Offline Points: 23 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 November 2021 at 3:23pm |
|
I think I know why it sounds clunky. I made this edit in 2001. Back then I would delete any silence that
the L.P. (CD) started out with. The edit I made started about a second before Neil sings 'Because I'm still in love with you' @ about 3:08 or 3:09, and my notes from then say, 'Remove 1:07.4', It doesn't say anything about a fade. Then I would add 300ms of silence at the beginning, and I've kind of standardized on that 300ms of silence in the beginning on all my restoration work. But we'll see what J.W.G. comes up with when he gets his CD single. -Bill. |
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
| Tweet |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Topic Options
sriv94 wrote: