![]() |
Hot 100 Compiled In 1969 |
Post Reply
|
| Author | ||
Paul Haney
Music Fan
Joined: 01 April 2005 Status: Offline Points: 48 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: Hot 100 Compiled In 1969Posted: 03 February 2021 at 2:53pm |
|
|
Don't remember if this has been posted here before, but there's a big article on just how the Billboard Hot 100 was
compiled in the issue dated September 13, 1969. Lots of great, detailed information! You can read it here (starts on page 56)... Billboard - September 13, 1969 |
||
![]() |
||
AutumnAarilyn
Music Fan
Joined: 22 August 2019 Status: Offline Points: 3 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 February 2021 at 11:14pm |
|
|
Thanks for posting. It was an interesting and not that
different from how the soul charts were tabulated. I find myself reading random issues of Billboard online that sometimes predate my birth. Furthermore and most importantly I just bought a ton of books off of Joel and a few that were out of print. Thanks for your hard work, Paul. |
||
![]() |
||
Hykker
Music Fan
Joined: 30 October 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 33 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 February 2021 at 7:18am |
|
|
Thanks for the link!! David Gleason's site is just
chock full of interesting historical info, and the old Billboards, R&Rs and other trade publications are fascinating to read. Of course, the radio play data was nowhere near as accurate back then as it is today with BDS monitoring. I imagine most of the major market stations had accurate playlists, but maybe not so much in smaller (yet still significant) markets. A station I worked at in the mid-ish 70s was a BB reporter, but we didn't keep logs of what we played...yeah, we followed a clock (ours had categories defined by colors), so you could get a pretty good idea of how many times a song got played, but it wasn't exact. And the trades were at the mercy of how honest the PD/MD was with reporting..."paper adds" (songs that were reported, but not played, or maybe just overnight) were rampant, as conversely songs were played but not reported (sounds counter-intuitive, but it happened). |
||
![]() |
||
jebsib
Music Fan
Joined: 06 April 2006 Status: Online Points: 16 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 February 2021 at 9:26am |
|
|
Just fascinating - Far more detail than I have ever seen pre-1973 articles.
I'd still love to know when airplay was re-introduced to the Top 50. The writer does not do a convincing job explaining why it was considered a less-than-relevant component - except as a bottom 50 supplement to sales data. Also amazed at how few markets were surveyed. Different times / priorities, I guess. |
||
![]() |
||
Paul Haney
Music Fan
Joined: 01 April 2005 Status: Offline Points: 48 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 February 2021 at 10:10am |
|
I'm not 100% certain, but I believe it happened for the week ending June 9, 1973. You can also find that issue at the same site. Edited by Paul Haney |
||
![]() |
||
jebsib
Music Fan
Joined: 06 April 2006 Status: Online Points: 16 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 February 2021 at 11:50am |
|
|
Thanks Paul - yeah, top 50 airplay was definitely part of that new 6/9/73
formula. I'd just be surprised if it had been absent that whole time. BTW, does anyone recall in 1990 all those Hot 100 Spotlight columns where the chart manager (Michael Ellis) was contemplating splitting the Hot 100 into 2 separate charts (airplay and sales) due to increasing disparities? Can you just imagine! |
||
![]() |
||
Brian W.
Music Fan
Joined: 13 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 38 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 05 February 2021 at 6:18am |
|
|
Thanks for posting that, Paul. Really fascinating. So at
the time the article was published, the difference between the final data gathering day and the date on the magazine issue was 12 days. |
||
![]() |
||
Brian W.
Music Fan
Joined: 13 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 38 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 05 February 2021 at 3:58pm |
|
He doesn't, but it was explained when they started doing it, on Page 3 of the May 11, 1968 issue:
|
||
![]() |
||
Post Reply
|
|
| Tweet |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |