Top 40 Music on CD Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Top 40 Music On Compact Disc > Chat Board
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Jive Five-"I’m A Happy Man"
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Jive Five-"I’m A Happy Man"

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
jimct View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 07 April 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jimct Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Jive Five-"I’m A Happy Man"
    Posted: 11 September 2009 at 3:54pm
I just happened upon some info, attributed to WCBS-FM DJ/oldies expert Bob Shannon. Shannon states that Eugene Pitt's vocal on the 45 and LP versions of this song are different. Bob says that UA apparently felt that Pitt's mono 45 vocals were a little "mumbly", and demanded a "better-enunciated" vocal effort for the LP. Apparently, this diction difference can be detected right away, on Pitt's cold-intro opening line sing. Would any of our "trained ears" on here be kind enough to compare/contrast the two versions in question for confirmation? Thanks.
Back to Top
Yah Shure View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 11 December 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Yah Shure Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 September 2009 at 7:43pm
It's a challenge to compare these, since the 45 runs noticeably slower than the track on EMI's Rock Is Dead But It Won't Lie Down CD. As the two first played, the only real difference I noticed was that the CD track began with Eugene singing "I'm..." while on the 45 it sounds more like "Ah'mm..."

But it's at the fadeout where it really becomes apparent that they are, indeed, different vocals. At 2:20 on the CD, Pitt sings "waaaaaaa-yeah-heahh, I'm a happy man, baby, as someone in the background sings "ah, ha, mama bama.." before Pitt adds a "woooooo..." On the 45, Pitt sings "waaaaaa-yea-aaa, I'm a happy man, wooo-ooooooooo..." There's no "baby" or background singer here.

While the vocals are different, I don't really hear that the LP lead is any better-enunciated than the 45, aside from the opening note. It's doo-wop; it's supposed to sound "mumbly!" Eugene should have enlisted Stan Freberg's help to show United Artists what real mumblification sounded like. :)

Great call on this one, Jim!
Back to Top
jimct View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 07 April 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jimct Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 September 2009 at 1:48pm
Thanks a million, sir, for both your time and your "expert ear song analysis" in this case, Yah Shure!
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.07
Copyright ©2001-2024 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.070 seconds.