Lou Rawls-"Lady Love"

Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic

   The two current database CDs that specify "45 version" for this song have run times of (3:34) and (3:40). My commercial 45 has a listed time of (3:41) and an actual time of (3:40), so choose the (3:40) Rhino CD over the (3:34) Ripete CD, if you'd like the correct 45 length on CD.

Author	Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic
jimct Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Music Fan Joined: 07 April 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0	Post Options Post Reply Quote jimct Thanks(0) Quote Reply Topic: Lou Rawls-"Lady Love" Posted: 29 November 2007 at 2:14pm
	The two current database CDs that specify "45 version" for this song have run times of (3:34) and (3:40). My commercial 45 has a listed time of (3:41) and an actual time of (3:40), so choose the (3:40) Rhino CD over the (3:34) Ripete CD, if you'd like the correct 45 length on CD.

Todd Ireland Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Music Fan Joined: 16 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 23	Post Options Post Reply Quote Todd Ireland Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: 19 March 2009 at 9:21pm
	I thought I'd bump up this thread in case Jim's 45 run time info for Lou Rawls' "Lady Love" was inadvertently overlooked for inclusion in the database.

Pat Downey Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Admin Group Joined: 01 October 2003 Status: Offline Points: 1	Post Options Post Reply Quote Pat Downey Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: 20 March 2009 at 10:24am
	Todd, I thought we were all in agreement that if the listed time and the actual time were less than :03 different, it was not appropriate to mention the discrepency.

Todd Ireland Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Music Fan Joined: 16 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 23	Post Options Post Reply Quote Todd Ireland Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: 20 March 2009 at 11:35am
	Yes, and I'm still in agreement with that rule, Pat. But I didn't mean to imply that the database should note the marginal :01 difference between the actual vs. printed 45 run time. I was thinking that the song's actual 45 run time of 3:40 should be noted (which you've now entered in the database) because it would be helpful for subscribers interested in seeking the correct 45 length on CD since the two 45 version appearances run 3:40 and 3:34, respectively, as Jim had pointed out. Sorry, I should've made myself more clear about this. Edited by Todd Ireland