Little Sister-"Somebody’s/You’re The One"
Printed From: Top 40 Music on CD
Category: Top 40 Music On Compact Disc
Forum Name: Chat Board
Forum Description: Chat away but please observe the chat board rules
URL: https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2004
Printed Date: 27 August 2025 at 8:25pm Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.07 - https://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Little Sister-"Somebody’s/You’re The One"
Posted By: jimct
Subject: Little Sister-"Somebody’s/You’re The One"
Date Posted: 06 May 2007 at 12:14am
My "Somebody's Watching You" commercial 45, which is mono, has a listed
time of (2:46), but an actual time of (2:55).
|
Replies:
Posted By: Indy500
Date Posted: 29 January 2011 at 6:17pm
The other Little Sister song in the database, "You're the One" shows (part 2) as being the hit. According to Top Pop Singles the charting version in 1970 was (part 1).
Can someone verify which side was the hit.
|
Posted By: TomDiehl1
Date Posted: 29 January 2011 at 7:47pm
Billboard Magazine didn't specify which side was the charter, in what I've been able to find in searching their back issues online....
------------- Live in stereo.
|
Posted By: Santi Paradoa
Date Posted: 29 January 2011 at 9:06pm
I always wondered why Eric Records released both Part 1 & Part 2 combined of "You're The One" instead of just one side or the other.
------------- Santi Paradoa
Miami, Florida
|
Posted By: Paul Haney
Date Posted: 30 January 2011 at 4:54am
Indy500 wrote:
The other Little Sister song in the database, "You're the One" shows (part 2) as being the hit. According to Top Pop Singles the charting version in 1970 was (part 1).
Can someone verify which side was the hit. |
You must have an older version of Top Pop Singles. The last couple of editions have shown Part II as the "hit" side.
|
Posted By: Indy500
Date Posted: 30 January 2011 at 10:02am
I do actually. 1955-1993 and it's actually in two halves now. lol
Thanks for confirming.
|
Posted By: edtop40
Date Posted: 10 June 2012 at 6:46pm
with regards to the little sister song "somebody's watching
you"...if you slow the cd version from below down to 73.50
bpm's, you'll effectively match the vinyl 45 speed and
length of 2:54....
(S)(2:51)Eric 11524 Hard To Find 45s On CD: Sweet Soul
Sounds
------------- edtop40
|
Posted By: edtop40
Date Posted: 10 June 2012 at 6:51pm
with regards to the other little sister song "you're the
one", the billboard book of top 40 hits issued by watson-
guptill states part 1 as the charting version.....paul
haney, can you confirm that part 1 was the hit....
------------- edtop40
|
Posted By: Paul Haney
Date Posted: 11 June 2012 at 2:49am
edtop40 wrote:
with regards to the other little sister song "you're the
one", the billboard book of top 40 hits issued by watson-
guptill states part 1 as the charting version.....paul
haney, can you confirm that part 1 was the hit.... |
Ed, you must have an older edition of that book. We've since changed it to Part II as the "hit" side.
|
Posted By: MMathews
Date Posted: 11 June 2012 at 2:46pm
Santi Paradoa wrote:
I always wondered why Eric Records
released both Part 1 & Part 2 combined of "You're The
One" instead of just one side or the other. |
I can help with that:
Bill Buster researched a thread about it, i thought it
was on this board, but i can't find it - so it may have
been at the BSN site, or Hoffman, not sure it's been so
long.
Bottom line was, it seemed split down the middle as some
folks heard Part 1 in their market, while others heard
Part 2. It varied wildly throughout the country.
Well, the obvious solution was to release the entire
unedited version, since either part can be extracted from
it. Yes, it's really long, but that way was no one was
left out.
MM
|
Posted By: edtop40
Date Posted: 11 June 2012 at 3:50pm
Paul Haney wrote:
edtop40 wrote:
with regards to the
other little sister song "you're the
one", the billboard book of top 40 hits issued by watson-
guptill states part 1 as the charting version.....paul
haney, can you confirm that part 1 was the hit....
|
Ed, you must have an older edition of that book. We've
since changed it to Part II as the "hit" side. |
paul, you're right about the old book...i was looking at
watson-guptill 6th edition of the top 40 hits book and i
do see it was changed to part 2 in the 9th
edition.....BUT....in the billboard 2005 hot 100 annual
book on page 244 it still says part 1....you might want
to make a note for future editions.....or was it changed
in a more recent issuance....
------------- edtop40
|
Posted By: mstgator
Date Posted: 11 June 2012 at 4:03pm
edtop40 wrote:
Paul Haney wrote:
edtop40 wrote:
with regards
to the
other little sister song "you're the
one", the billboard book of top 40 hits issued by watson-
guptill states part 1 as the charting version.....paul
haney, can you confirm that part 1 was the hit....
|
Ed, you must have an older edition of that book. We've
since changed it to Part II as the "hit" side. |
paul, you're right about the old book...i was looking at
watson-guptill 6th edition of the top 40 hits book and i
do see it was changed to part 2 in the 9th
edition.....BUT....in the billboard 2005 hot 100 annual
book on page 244 it still says part 1....you might want
to make a note for future editions.....or was it changed
in a more recent issuance.... |
I can answer that one... the 8th edition of Pop Annual (released a few
months ago) is corrected to show Part II.
|
Posted By: davidclark
Date Posted: 11 February 2013 at 11:14am
can anyone indicate how Part 1 ends and how/where Part 2 begins? I would
like to create them from the Eric CD. thanks.
------------- dc1
|
Posted By: MMathews
Date Posted: 11 February 2013 at 3:16pm
OK
It's been a few years but here's what i know:
The change-over in the long version is at exactly 3:28.
I don't have the exact 45 anymore, but from memory part 1
runs 3:15, and from the long version simply fade from
around 3 minutes until 3:15.
for part 2, there is no fade in, it picks up right at the
3:28 mark in the long one. It cuts in abruptly when
they yell at the "Aahhhhh" part. So you would use from
there to the end for part 2.
Addl. details about the 45 fades and run-time are
welcome...
MM
|
Posted By: davidclark
Date Posted: 11 February 2013 at 9:56pm
thanks Markie.
There doesn't seem to be an LP for this band. Is the Eric CD the first time
stereo? Also, is it first time the parts are presented together? Also, the
complete version contains several seconds not present on either side of the
45, according to Markie's timings. Note the a-side of the 45 states a run
time of 3:30.
------------- dc1
|
Posted By: MMathews
Date Posted: 11 February 2013 at 11:53pm
My timings are from faded memory .. hopefully someone has
the actual run times.
David, yes, this release was first time stereo and first
time released as one long take.
As far as i recall, the raw stereo tape was found by Bill
Inglot when he was in a vault looking for something else.
I'm just glad it came up for use someplace.
So yes, there might be a few seconds of audio just after
part one would have faded that we don't hear on the 45,
but there's nothing much unique there to hear.
I just remember we timed it out, because some folks were
sure they heard one or the other parts in their area, we
made sure both parts were present.
|
Posted By: Paul C
Date Posted: 18 February 2013 at 3:10pm
I timed Part 1 of "You're The One" at (3:30) and Part 2 at (3:13). There is a mono version of the song on the Ace UK CD, Listen To The Voices - Sly Stone In The Studio - 1965-70, that runs (5:21). It is missing the last part of Part 1 and the first part of Part 2. The Ace CD also has "Somebody's Watching You" in mono.
|
Posted By: aaronk
Date Posted: 18 February 2013 at 3:41pm
Great info, Paul! Do they sound like vinyl dubs, or were they taken from master tapes? Also, how much of "You're The One" is missing?
------------- Aaron Kannowski http://www.uptownsound.com" rel="nofollow - Uptown Sound http://www.919thepeak.com" rel="nofollow - 91.9 The Peak - Classic Hip Hop
|
Posted By: Paul C
Date Posted: 18 February 2013 at 5:43pm
They definitely don't sound like vinyl dubs to me, Aaron.
I've tried to conduct a more accurate comparison of the version of "You're The One" on the Ace CD and the 45, and it now appears to me that the Ace version switches from Part 1 to Part 2 at (2:09) and then continues with all of Part 2. (So I now believe that my statement above that the first part of Part 2 is missing is incorrect.) It is a bit difficult to tell for sure, however, since the segment of Part 1 that starts at (2:09) is so similar to the first segment of Part 2 that it's hard to tell which segment is on the Ace CD. (The two segments sound so similar to me that it wouldn't surprise me if it's actually the same piece of tape.) The very last segment of Part 1 is definitely not on the Ace CD.
|
Posted By: aaronk
Date Posted: 18 February 2013 at 8:32pm
If there is any way you could send the file for me to hear, that would be
excellent :)
------------- Aaron Kannowski http://www.uptownsound.com" rel="nofollow - Uptown Sound http://www.919thepeak.com" rel="nofollow - 91.9 The Peak - Classic Hip Hop
|
Posted By: davidclark
Date Posted: 18 February 2013 at 11:39pm
Paul, can you describe the Part 1 fade?
------------- dc1
|
Posted By: MMathews
Date Posted: 19 February 2013 at 10:24pm
David,
i can jump in here also, as Ed just sent me the dubs of
both part 1 and 2.
The fade on part 1 starts around 3:05, is long and slow,
with final audio disappearing at 3:30.
Now, you may notice that doing that from the Eric cd,
that makes the beginning of Part 2 audible at the tail
end. Yet, on the 45, those last 2 seconds are different,
they sound like the same groove as just before there but
continuing on. (if you understand that...)
I'm not sure why, other than for the mono mix, they
edited that final portion differently.
For Paul C: i agree that i think they used segments of
this song more than once. The long version to me always
sounded like an extended version of a shorter take.
Also - Ed's copy for Part 1 agrees with yours; (3:30).
But for Part 2 - can you double check your timing of
(3:13)? ... i checked again and my copy (Ed's copy) for
Part 2 is completely finished at (3:11).
For David: when creating Part 2 from the CD, the CD
version finishes 2 secs sooner at the fade.
It's possible that audio was on the tape but that it was
so low at that point we faded it out. I'm not sure.
MM
|
Posted By: edtop40
Date Posted: 04 November 2014 at 3:29pm
my commercial 45 for the little sister song 'somebody's
watching you' issued as stone flower 9001 lists the run
time on the label as 2:46 but actually runs 2:54...
------------- edtop40
|
|