Print Page | Close Window

"Breaking Us in Two" - Joe Jackson

Printed From: Top 40 Music on CD
Category: Top 40 Music On Compact Disc
Forum Name: Chat Board
Forum Description: Chat away but please observe the chat board rules
URL: https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=250
Printed Date: 09 May 2025 at 4:20am
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.07 - https://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: "Breaking Us in Two" - Joe Jackson
Posted By: Todd Ireland
Subject: "Breaking Us in Two" - Joe Jackson
Date Posted: 21 May 2005 at 1:29pm
Does anyone know if a DJ edit exists for Joe Jackson's "Breaking Us in Two"? The 10th edition doesn't mention anything about one, but I seem to recall hearing a shorter version on the radio than the one I'm accustomed to seeing on CD running 4:47-4:52.



Replies:
Posted By: sriv94
Date Posted: 04 November 2005 at 11:10am
I'm sure a shorter version also exists (one that edits out everything from the second line of the instrumental break to the final "Could we be much closer if we tried" line). I remember it being played on AT40 back in the day.

-------------
Doug
---------------
All of the good signatures have been taken.


Posted By: Todd Ireland
Date Posted: 01 May 2006 at 9:52pm
Attention, jimct:

You mentioned in a previous thread that you specialize in DJ promo 45s. Do you have a DJ 45 of Joe Jackson's "Breaking Us in Two" and, if so, could you tell us what is the actual run time on your copy?

Thanks much, and welcome to the message board!


Posted By: AndrewChouffi
Date Posted: 01 May 2006 at 10:34pm
I own the domestic USA promo 45, but I don't have time to listen to it right now.

One side is labelled 4:57 (album version).

Other side is labelled 3:48 (edited version).

Andy


Posted By: jimct
Date Posted: 01 May 2006 at 10:57pm
Thanks, Todd for the welcome - right in my wheelhouse...since Andy just posted the correct listed DJ 45 times, I will simply add that the (3:48) short side is a rarity, in that the actual run time is just (3:42).


Posted By: Grant
Date Posted: 02 May 2006 at 2:02am
That edit should be a snap to recreate from the LP version. It cuts out most of the instrumental break in the middle.


Posted By: Pat Downey
Date Posted: 02 May 2006 at 5:54am
Jim, could you time the long version of this song on your dj copy as my commercial copy runs (4:46) not (4:57) as stated on the record label.


Posted By: jimct
Date Posted: 02 May 2006 at 9:25am
Pat: When my long DJ timing of "Breaking Us In Two" came in at (4:44), I was surprised that those last 3 seconds weren't there. To be sure, I stop-watched it a second time, making sure I got EVERY milli-second of fade (which I always try to do anyway.) Nope, it's definitely (4:44). Just reporting the facts... (PS - deadwax says "A&M-AM-02510A-Long - P1")


Posted By: sriv94
Date Posted: 02 May 2006 at 11:35am
Originally posted by Grant Grant wrote:

That edit should be a snap to recreate from the LP version. It cuts out most of the instrumental break in the middle.


I agree, but I always thought the edit sounded awkward. You could've made a better edit by just excising the instrumental break and bridge and verse leading up to it.

I may try that--one of these days (of course, I'd also have to try to create the edit as it actually was as well). :)

-------------
Doug
---------------
All of the good signatures have been taken.


Posted By: Todd Ireland
Date Posted: 02 May 2006 at 1:32pm
Originally posted by jimct jimct wrote:

Pat: When my long DJ timing of "Breaking Us In Two" came in at (4:44), I was surprised that those last 3 seconds weren't there. To be sure, I stop-watched it a second time, making sure I got EVERY milli-second of fade (which I always try to do anyway.) Nope, it's definitely (4:44). Just reporting the facts... (PS - deadwax says "A&M-AM-02510A-Long - P1")


I've seen a number of cases in the database where the DJ copies of a song may differ from its commercial 45 release by several seconds. Sounds like this may be such a case with "Breaking Us in Two".

Thanks for helping solve another mystery, guys!


Posted By: edtop40
Date Posted: 13 April 2008 at 9:27am
my commercial 45 issued as a&m 2510 states a run time on the label of 4:57 but actually runs 4:46....it is also slightly sped up as well...(anyone else notice this).....if you fade out from 4:40-4:46 you'll be able to re-create the proper 45 version.....

-------------
edtop40


Posted By: abagon
Date Posted: 08 June 2011 at 10:05am
The actual LP running time is (4:55), the listed time is "4:57" on the LP record label (A&M SP-4906)
My commercial 45 ran (4:46). The 45 is slight shorter, and faster than the vinyl LP. I think CD entries need "45 speed" or "LP speed" comment. Because it has speed difference of 4 seconds.
The last word "two" in the lyric "breaking us in two" on the last verse is at (4:14) on the vinyl LP, the same point on the 45 is at (4:10).
Nice finding, ed!

--abagon


Posted By: sriv94
Date Posted: 08 June 2011 at 10:20am
Was the short side of the promo also slightly sped?

-------------
Doug
---------------
All of the good signatures have been taken.


Posted By: eriejwg
Date Posted: 08 June 2011 at 7:19pm
Yes, it was pitched up. There was a thread a few years ago describing how to recreate the 45 version. Will try and locate it.


Posted By: eric_a
Date Posted: 03 September 2017 at 10:49pm
I discovered that the UK single has a different edit from
the US single or radio edit. From what I can tell, it's
just an early fade to 4:32, and pitched up slightly (less
than +1%).



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.07 - https://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2024 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net