"Dry Your Eyes" - Brenda & Tabulations
Printed From: Top 40 Music on CD
Category: Top 40 Music On Compact Disc
Forum Name: Chat Board
Forum Description: Chat away but please observe the chat board rules
URL: https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4689
Printed Date: 16 August 2025 at 2:00pm Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.07 - https://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: "Dry Your Eyes" - Brenda & Tabulations
Posted By: Paul Haney
Subject: "Dry Your Eyes" - Brenda & Tabulations
Date Posted: 04 March 2009 at 2:16pm
Our commercial copy of "Dry Your Eyes" by Brenda & The Tabulations (Dionn 500) states a time of (2:30), but actually runs (2:41).
|
Replies:
Posted By: Todd Ireland
Date Posted: 05 December 2010 at 10:50pm
There are several stereo CD appearances of "Dry Your Eyes" that run 2:48, which is :07 longer than the mono 45. Can anyone who might have the Brenda & the Tabulations Dry Your Eyes parent vinyl LP from 1968 please verify if it features the longer stereo length?
|
Posted By: TomDiehl1
Date Posted: 06 December 2010 at 5:04am
Todd:
If the mono 45 runs 2:41 as stated by Paul above, the 2:30 time listed on the label is way off and cds more than likely resemble something close to what the 45 features, by being just 3 seconds off -- shorter, not longer.
I'd be curious to know if there was a speed issue involved, but I can't even seem to locate any of my copies of the 45 which I know I've picked up a couple of times over the years.
------------- Live in stereo.
|
Posted By: Paul Haney
Date Posted: 06 December 2010 at 5:45am
Todd Ireland wrote:
There are several stereo CD appearances of "Dry Your Eyes" that run 2:38, which is :08 longer than the mono 45. Can anyone who might have the Brenda & the Tabulations Dry Your Eyes parent vinyl LP from 1968 please verify if it features the longer stereo length? |
Todd, I'm a little confused on this post as well. Perhaps you meant to say the stereo appearances run 2:48 (which would be :07 longer than the mono 45) instead of 2:38???
|
Posted By: Todd Ireland
Date Posted: 06 December 2010 at 8:39pm
Yes, I meant 2:48. I went back and corrected my typo.
|
Posted By: TomDiehl1
Date Posted: 06 December 2010 at 10:34pm
Okay, gotcha...typos happen a lot with timings -- I know I have to triple check every timing I put just to make sure I get it right. Unfortunately I don't have the album to help with a timing on the track there. I've never been big into album collecting for some reason.
------------- Live in stereo.
|
|