Print Page | Close Window

Dion - Runaround Sue

Printed From: Top 40 Music on CD
Category: Top 40 Music On Compact Disc
Forum Name: Chat Board
Forum Description: Chat away but please observe the chat board rules
URL: https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=7017
Printed Date: 12 May 2025 at 12:20pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.07 - https://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Dion - Runaround Sue
Posted By: aaronk
Subject: Dion - Runaround Sue
Date Posted: 20 August 2012 at 11:48pm
After comparing the mono mix with the stereo mix, I believe a notation should be made in the database for CDs with the mono mix that reads "mono LP and 45 version." The stereo version is missing the slap back echo on the percussion/handclaps and lead vocal. Instead, the stereo version has added reverb to the vocal and percussion.

The very first post on the board, made by Bob Lovely, talks about "The Wanderer" being "dry" on some stereo mixes and "wet" on others, and he says that the reverb was added during the mastering. This makes sense for both "The Wanderer" and "Runaround Sue" because the vocal on the mono mix does not sound like reverb has been added. Instead, the vocal has the tape/slapback echo that is missing from the stereo versions.

-------------
Aaron Kannowski
http://www.uptownsound.com" rel="nofollow - Uptown Sound
http://www.919thepeak.com" rel="nofollow - 91.9 The Peak - Classic Hip Hop



Replies:
Posted By: eriejwg
Date Posted: 22 August 2012 at 6:38pm
Is it possible some mono versions may be an earlier or
alternate vocal take?


Posted By: aaronk
Date Posted: 22 August 2012 at 7:26pm
Anything is possible, but the mono and stereo mixes I have are the
same vocal take.

-------------
Aaron Kannowski
http://www.uptownsound.com" rel="nofollow - Uptown Sound
http://www.919thepeak.com" rel="nofollow - 91.9 The Peak - Classic Hip Hop


Posted By: MMathews
Date Posted: 22 August 2012 at 9:20pm
Aaron,

after i saw this i was curious because i hadn't heard the
mono version of this since the early 80's... (and never
looked back!)
So i went to youtube and i must have played 5 or 6
different dubs of the 45...i must say i DO hear what you
mean about the slap echo, but only on the hand-claps, and
maaaybe the backing vocals (del-satins, i believe) but i
do not hear echo on Dion. I hear standard reverb.
Not disagreeing about a LP/45 version notation but i
never recalled hearing slap echo on Dion himself.
anyone else?
MM


Posted By: aaronk
Date Posted: 22 August 2012 at 11:01pm
What I'm hearing (at least on my mono copy) is a very subtle slapback after the song kicks in. What I'm calling "slapback" is basically the entire vocal delayed by less than a half second and at a lower volume. I sent you my mono copy to hear the same copy I'm listening to.

It's most noticeable on the "s" consonent (such as on the line at 0:54 "listen people what I'm telling you," the "s" in listen) and when the music stops during the line "keep away from runaround Sue." It's not just reverb; it's a vocal delay at a lower volume, which is what I'm calling slapback.

-------------
Aaron Kannowski
http://www.uptownsound.com" rel="nofollow - Uptown Sound
http://www.919thepeak.com" rel="nofollow - 91.9 The Peak - Classic Hip Hop


Posted By: MMathews
Date Posted: 23 August 2012 at 1:37am
Ok
Aaron sent me a nice clear dub of his 45, and i DO hear
the slap echo (aka tape-delay) on Dion's voice as well,
it occurs during the body of the song, just not in the
intro.

Interestingly, you'd think you could sort of "create" a
stereo 45 mix by adding some echo to the stereo mix,
however i don't hear it on the Del-satins, only on Dion
and the clapping. They come thru loud and clear without
the echo.



Posted By: aaronk
Date Posted: 23 August 2012 at 6:54am
Ok, I'm glad I'm not crazy, Mark!

I noticed that Pat has added the "45 and mono LP version" comment
next to the appropriate CDs. How do you think the stereo mix ought to
be labeled? It is my understanding that there were no stereo LP
versions released in 1961. That would technically make all those CDs
"remixed" or "neither" versions, right?

-------------
Aaron Kannowski
http://www.uptownsound.com" rel="nofollow - Uptown Sound
http://www.919thepeak.com" rel="nofollow - 91.9 The Peak - Classic Hip Hop


Posted By: MMathews
Date Posted: 23 August 2012 at 10:42pm
Well, since the stereo version did debut on an LP, i'd
think "LP version" should still suffice. It just happens
that the LP in question was later.
I can't be sure, but i think it was a V/A Lp from 1968
called something "Laurie Golden Goodies" - i used to own
it. I'm sure can expert can correct me on that.
Otherwise, since the stereo mix is so prevalent, why not
just put "45 version" next to a cd with it, and leave the
others with no label. Does it really need one?
Just a thought.


Posted By: Todd Ireland
Date Posted: 24 August 2012 at 5:54pm
I'm of the opinion that if the database is going to include "45 and mono LP version" comments for "Runaround Sue", then there really should a comment for the stereo mix since it technically can't be considered the "hit" version due to the reverb/echo differences. I would suggest maybe either adding a general comment underneath the song title stating something like: "The stereo version of this song is slightly remixed", or individually inserting a "slightly remixed" comment next to each stereo CD entry.


Posted By: davidclark
Date Posted: 09 September 2012 at 10:36pm
yes, Mark, according to the BSN website's extensive LP labels discography
section, Runaround Sue was in true stereo on the 1967 LP "Laurie Golden
Goodies". You have a great memory!

-------------
dc1


Posted By: PopArchivist
Date Posted: 05 February 2022 at 9:14pm
Originally posted by aaronk aaronk wrote:

Ok, I'm glad I'm not crazy, Mark!

I noticed that Pat has added the "45 and mono LP version" comment
next to the appropriate CDs. How do you think the stereo mix ought to
be labeled? It is my understanding that there were no stereo LP
versions released in 1961. That would technically make all those CDs
"remixed" or "neither" versions, right?


Aaron,

You can hear the clear difference between the Mono and the Stereo. This would be a perfect one for Eric Records to do in DES Stereo! I labeled it Stereo LP Remix since you are right no LP versions were released in 1961, but it was on an LP and it was a "remixed" version.

Good ear!

-------------
Favorite two expressions to live by on this board: "You can't download vinyl" and "Not everything is available on CD."


Posted By: KentT
Date Posted: 19 February 2022 at 7:09pm
Ace's Stereo is excellent on their LP and CD. And no
Columbia echo chamber on this recording(which was at the
30th Street studio in New York City) and this will never
sound correct. Which is how Laurie got their reverb.

-------------
I turn up the good and turn down the bad!



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.07 - https://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2024 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net