![]() |
rembrandts "ill be there for you" |
Post Reply
|
Page <12 |
| Author | |
Paul Haney
Music Fan
Joined: 01 April 2005 Status: Offline Points: 48 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 May 2010 at 5:44am |
Actually, Fred Bronson's final Chart Beat column was in March of 2009. It's now authored by Billboard's Gary Trust. BTW, Paul Grein has a great weekly chart blog on Yahoo Music. Edited by Paul Haney |
|
![]() |
|
Yah Shure
Music Fan
Joined: 11 December 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 May 2010 at 4:24pm |
Oops. I must have been thinking of the 78. ;) Thanks all for providing the correct timeline. |
|
![]() |
|
jimct
Music Fan
Joined: 07 April 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 May 2010 at 5:07pm |
|
As my buddy Paul Haney knows, for many years I have been a big purchaser/supporter of Record Research/Mr. Whitburn's publications, and I know he is sometimes hamstrung by the changing Billboard policies of the 90's. I was at the same Top 40 station for 30 years, and I compiled our year-end countdowns for 28 of those years. "I'll Be There For You" was by far our #1 song of the year in 1995. And never was the "points margin" between it and the #2 song of the year so wide. It was without question one of the 3 biggest hits in my entire 30 years. And while I realize we were just one station, this song was absolutely massive everywhere on the Top 40 side. I've always felt that no other song's true popularity has been more misrepresented in the reference books in the entire rock era than this one has been. I blame it almost 100% on the later association to "This House Is Not A Home". We never even played that song on our station, and it really has nothing at all to do with the previous smash, aside from the fact that the two were "coupled" on a Billboard-approved single format, VERY late in the "I'll Be There For You" hit run, by which point any trickle of residual singles sales would reflect nothing at all meaningful. This one, highly questionable policy at the time has to me completely overruled both the facts, and just plain common sense, ever since. In my respectful opinion, RR needs to totally re-examine/re-assess how it has currently interpreted this song's popularity, because it is grossly misrepresented as currently shown (as I step off my soapbox.) FYI, here are my promo CD single details for both:
The Rembrandts-"I'll Be There For You" (PRCD 9202-2) 1-(non-described version) (listed: none; actual 3:06) The Rembrandts-"This House Is Not A Home" (PRCD 9279-2) 1-(LP Version) (listed 3:17; actual 3:16) |
|
![]() |
|
mstgator
Music Fan
Joined: 06 September 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 31 May 2010 at 7:42am |
|
jim: I agree... at the very least, RR should include a title note indicating that IBTFY spent 8 weeks atop the Hot 100 Airplay chart prior to its single release (since separate Sales/Airplay data was ditched after the 10th edition of Top Pop Singles).
Paul C: I could be mistaken, but I recall that AC airplay was added to the Hot 100 mix on 7/17/93, and Modern Rock was added a year or so after that (this was mentioned at the time in Billboard's weekly Hot 100 Singles Spotlight column). As you mentioned, the remaining formats weren't added until the chart's massive overhaul in November 1998. |
|
![]() |
|
Paul C
Music Fan
Joined: 23 October 2006 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 30 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 June 2010 at 5:12am |
You are correct, sir! |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page <12 |
| Tweet |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |