![]() |
Roxette - "It Must Have Been Love" |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <12 |
Author | |
LunarLaugh ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 13 February 2020 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 11 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The Cool Rock commercial is forever engrained into my mind. It's incredibly hard for me to not think of it whenever I happen to hear one of those songs. |
|
![]() |
|
Bellenger1981 ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 18 July 2019 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 8 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
First of all, I'm glad that I could help. The reason that the Spanish version of "It Must Have Been Love" ("No Se Si Es Emor") has a slightly different sounding instrumental/backing track is because, as far as I know, it was re-recorded from scratch in 1996 for the "Baladas en Espanol" release. In other words, they simply did not use a pre-existing instrumental/backing track of the past (1990 or 1987) and sing over it. So, yes, as far as I know, this 1996 Spanish version is the very first version of the song to use this "new" (meaning 1996) instrumental/backing track. In fact, it is the only version of the song to use this backing track, as far as I know, as again, it would have been recorded specifically for "Baladas en Espanol" in 1996. It was probably decided to draw this version out to 4:41 instead of fading it out earlier (like the 1990 version). I am by no means a Roxette expert, but I'm a huge fan and have followed them quite a bit over the past 20 years. Hopefully, I understood what you were asking and answered your questions. If not, let me know. |
|
Jason Bellenger
Byron Center, Michigan, USA |
|
![]() |
|
EdisonLite ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 18 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 169 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yes you answered it Jason. Thanks. That explains it clearly. But it makes me wonder why they didn't just use the existing backing track from 1990, which was so great. Maybe they did the "Baladas" album for another label and weren't allowed to use it? If not, it just doesn't make much sense to spend the time/effort/money to re-record it. It's not like they made it sound like a more Spanish-music influenced recording.
|
|
![]() |
|
Bellenger1981 ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 18 July 2019 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 8 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Maybe the idea was to give some of these, at the time,
older recordings a more modern touch by re-recording them from scratch. Not sure. "Baladas en Espanol" was released on the label to which they had been signed since "Pearls of Passion" in 1986 (EMI Records), so it was not a label issue. |
|
Jason Bellenger
Byron Center, Michigan, USA |
|
![]() |
|
PopArchivist ![]() Music Fan ![]() ![]() Joined: 30 June 2018 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 26 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
That original Christmas For The Broken Hearted mix is available digitally on Qobuz FYI if anyone wants it along with the LA 1992 version: https://www.qobuz.com/us-en/album/it-must-have-been-love-rox ette/0825646124688 Edited by PopArchivist |
|
Favorite two expressions to live by on this board: "You can't download vinyl" and "Not everything is available on CD."
|
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <12 |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |