|
Tane Cain mastering speed comparisons |
Post Reply 
|
| Author | ||||
budaniel 
Music Fan 
Joined: 12 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply
 Topic: Tane Cain mastering speed comparisonsPosted: 04 December 2015 at 10:17pm |
|||
|
I've had the Renaissance release of Tane Cain's album for a while, but I just picked up the new Rock Candy release because the Renaissance was mastered from vinyl. For starters, the Rock Candy release sounds a bit brick walled, but even more importantly, all the songs are quite a bit slower and run about 7 to 10 seconds longer than on the Renaissance CD. For instance, "Holdin' On" runs 3:12 on Renaissance, and 3:22 on Rock Candy. Based on the database listing the correct run time as 3:14, it almost seems to me as if the Rock Candy release is actually mastered too slow (to my ear, it actually has that messed up vinyl groove sound to it).
Not sure what the correct speed is supposed to be, but to my ears, the Rock Candy release sounds too slow! Edited by budaniel |
||||
 |
||||
|
aaronk
Admin Group
Joined: 16 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 138 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 05 December 2015 at 12:42pm |
|||
All of these statements seem to contradict each other, so I'm not sure which one runs too slow (or too fast). |
||||
|
||||
|
budaniel
Music Fan
Joined: 12 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 December 2015 at 4:56pm |
|||
|
Ha. Sorry, aaron. I mixed up my R labels as I was writing. Fixed it. The Rock Candy release is slow.
|
||||
|
||||
|
Post Reply
|
|
| Tweet |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Topic Options
budaniel wrote: