![]() |
Marc Anthony-You Sang To Me |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 12> |
Author | ||
Robert ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 04 March 2006 Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 23 February 2007 at 4:56pm |
|
Pat's DB lists this song as a 5:46 LP version and a 3:50 45 version. However, the version appearing on the OST of Runaway Bride clocks in at 5:23. Anyone know the scoop on this? Could this be the 45 edit and the 3:50 version the radio edit, not the 45? Help anyone??
|
||
![]() |
||
Paul C ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 23 October 2006 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 9 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
The commercial vinyl 45 is actually the full 5:46 LP version (I don't know about other commercial single formats), although the label states a time of 5:25. (Robert, does it actually run 5:23 on the Runaway Bride OST or does the CD simply state so?) The promo CD single has the "Radio Edit" (3:51) and the "LP Version" (5:47).
|
||
![]() |
||
Robert ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 04 March 2006 Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Paul, the CD doesn't have any time listing. It's real time and it's 5:23, complete with the ending (not faded). So if the vinyl 45 is the 5:46 LP version, and the radio edit is 3:51, then what the heck is this one? Maybe there's a third version or edit that appeared only on the OST. Or maybe a second 45 version. I haven't been this confused since my honeymoon.
|
||
![]() |
||
Todd Ireland ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 16 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 18 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Robert:
In cases like this, Pat usually denotes a movie soundtrack CD containing a different edit or version of a Top 40 hit with the comment: (soundtrack version). I believe this policy applies when a soundtrack is released at approximately the same time as the Top 40 hit in question. Pat, feel free to chime in if I'm wrong. Edited by Todd Ireland |
||
![]() |
||
David Pro ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 10 August 2020 Location: Chile Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
The US CD Maxi Single (44K 79428) contains the following
tracklisting: 1. You Sang To Me (Remix) 5:30 2. You Sang To Me (Remix Radio Edit) 3:49 3. You Sang To Me (Album Version) 5:47 4. Muy Dentro De Mi (You Sang To Me) (Spanish) 5:54 5. Muy Dentro De Mi (You Sang To Me) (Spanglish) 3:56 Is track 2 the same "Radio Edit" Paul mentions on the promo CD single? |
||
![]() |
||
eriejwg ![]() Music Fan ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 June 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 41 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Am I to assume that the soundtrack version with an actual
running time of 5:23 is the 5:30 remix? |
||
![]() |
||
EdisonLite ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 18 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
One of the most interesting bits of Billboard Hot 100 trivia I ever came across. And it's something virtually no one would know. Most chart fans might know this song peaked at #2 on the Hot 100. I happened to be at Fred Bronson's house the day the chart came out that week. He told me the difference between the #1 and #2 song on the chart that week was so close that IF "You Sang To Me" got ONE more play on a NYC station, it would have peaked at #1 that week! Just one more spin! Incidentally, Fred wrote for Billboard's Chart Beat column at that time and for many years, so he would know!
I wonder how many other #2 hits were virtually #1 hits and we just will never know how close they came. Edited by EdisonLite |
||
![]() |
||
PopArchivist ![]() Music Fan ![]() ![]() Joined: 30 June 2018 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 17 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I've always wondered how close Foreigner - Waiting For A Girl Like You was in 1981. Olivia Newton John's Physical and Hall & Oates I Can't Go For That if I recall matched the entire 10 week run blocking it from hitting #1. Same goes for Missy Elliot's Work It which as #2 for 10 weeks, which I think was blocked by Eminem's Lose Yourself, which had 12 weeks. Then you have songs that spent crazy weeks at #2 Like Exhale (Shoop Shoop) by Whitney Houston and Sweet Dreams (Are Made Of These) which managed to finally sneak a week at #1 after massive hits of the year kept them out (One Sweet Day and Every Breath You Take respectfully). It would make it quite interesting to know how close both Missy and Foreigner were to #1 at any time during their 10 week #2 runs... |
||
Favorite two expressions to live by on this board: "You can't download vinyl" and "Not everything is available on CD."
|
||
![]() |
||
aaronk ![]() Admin Group ![]() Joined: 16 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 88 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I just listened to the "Remix" on YouTube, and this is a totally different recording from the original mix (new vocals and new instrumentation). Presumably, the "Remix Radio Edit" would be an edit of the longer version. When the song was a current, we played the "Radio Edit" from the promo CD, which is a short version of the LP version. |
||
![]() |
||
David Pro ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 10 August 2020 Location: Chile Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
The music video for "You Sang to Me" uses a shorter edit of the album version which could be the same "Radio Edit" from the promo CD single. https://youtu.be/MY4YJxn-9Og Additionally, I recall seeing the video for the Spanish-language version titled "Muy Dentro de Mi" and uses a shorter edit of the 5:54 remix in Spanish which uses the same mix as the remix of the English version. This shorter edit of the Spanish version runs 3:50 and has received airplay in several Latin American radio stations. |
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 12> |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |