Top 40 Music on CD Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Top 40 Music On Compact Disc > Chat Board
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Peabo Bryson - If Ever You’re In My Arms
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Peabo Bryson - If Ever You’re In My Arms

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
Author
Message
eriejwg View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan
Avatar

Joined: 10 June 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 40
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote eriejwg Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Peabo Bryson - If Ever You’re In My Arms
    Posted: 19 December 2010 at 9:17pm
I know the 45 speed/length is on a couple of CD's, but can the 45 speed/length be recreated? If so, speed/fade points, if possible...
Back to Top
aaronk View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 84
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote aaronk Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 December 2010 at 11:07pm
It's pitched up by 2.5%. I would presume that the fade starts at the same point as on the album but just dumps out earlier. After you perform the increase in pitch, the fade will start at 3:40. Given the 3:55 run time of the discs with the 45 length/speed, that would make the fade about 15 seconds long. By contrast, the LP fade out goes on for nearly 30 seconds.
Back to Top
EdisonLite View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 18 October 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote EdisonLite Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 December 2010 at 12:31am
For some reason, I felt that the pitch increases as the song goes on, incrementally of course so it's not noticeable. For instance (and I don't know the exact numbers), it might start out at 1% faster but by the last chorus be 2.5% faster. I could be completely wrong about this - this is sort of what I noticed back in the '80s. Is there anyone here who's an expert on speeds who can determine if this is what's going on? Or is it exactly 2.5% faster all the way through from beginning to end?
Back to Top
EdisonLite View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 18 October 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote EdisonLite Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 December 2010 at 12:34am
And one thing I always remembered about the early fade on the 45. On the album version at the very end, there is one "If ever you're in my arms again" that is not present on the 45 version because the 45 is over at this point, and what's interesting is that Peabo's enunciation of "ever" in that one line is closer to "ev-uh", whereas on all other lines in the song, the "r" is more present, as in "ever". So on the 45, you never hear that slightly different (less proper) enunciation.
Back to Top
aaronk View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 84
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote aaronk Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 December 2010 at 9:35am
Originally posted by EdisonLite EdisonLite wrote:

Is it exactly 2.5% faster all the way through from beginning to end?

Good question. I essentially looked at the database, found one that was labeled "45 speed," and found a sample of that CD online to determine how much it was pitched up. One of the K-Tel discs, during the 30 second sample, was pitched up by 2.5%, which is where my number comes from. I probably shouldn't assume that the pitch is constant throughout, so I'll see if I can track down an actual dub of the 45. I will say, though, that in the hundreds of custom edits I've worked on, not once have I needed to do a gradual pitch increase to the source file.

One thing to note about the sample I heard was that the 2.5% pitch was toward the beginning of the song, so that would lead me to believe that if there is a gradual increase, it would have been all the way to "top speed" by about a minute into the song. Also, there is a key change later in the song, so maybe that's what you're remembering, EdisonLite?

Edited by aaronk
Back to Top
crapfromthepast View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan
Avatar

Joined: 14 September 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote crapfromthepast Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 December 2010 at 6:13pm
Checked my CD copies. Didn't see any drift in any of them. The song is played with a click track, so it's pretty easy to check the CDs.

The earliest CD I have it on is Warner Special Products' 3-CD Secret Love (1987), where it runs at 48.0 BPM throughout. The same analog transfer is used for Time Life's 2-CD Body Talk (1994).

There's a different analog transfer on Priority's Eighties Greatest Rock Hits Vol. 13 (1994), which is almost certainly a digital clone of another CD (based on my experience with that particular Priority disc).

It runs at 48.2 BPM throughout. There are differently EQ'd digital clones on Time-Life's Sounds Of The Eighties Vol. 15 - The Mid-'80s (1996; may be some extra compression/limiting), Time-Life's 2-CD Body Talk Vol. 2 - Just For You (1996), and Time-Life's 2-CD Body And Soul Vol. 9 - Sweet Embrace (1999; digitally identical to Just For You). The version on The A-List sounds pretty close to the above discs.

No tempo drifts on any of these. Not sure what's on the 45, though.

Edited by crapfromthepast
There's a lot of crap on the radio, but there's only one Crap From The Past.
Back to Top
EdisonLite View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 18 October 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote EdisonLite Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 December 2010 at 7:08pm
Aaron, I'm familiar with the key change and it's definitely not what I'm remembering. And also, if it does speed up, it doesn't mean it stops at 2.5% in the middle. It could well go all the way to 3.5% by the end.

Crapfromthepast, if you check the database, are any of your CDs you reference above using what Pat labels the 45 speed/length? If they're all the album speed/length, there would be no speed up. It would only occur in the single. Also, there's the possibility that some of these CDs contained a sped up tape but may not exactly be the single master (it's not likely but it IS possible.)

I analyzed this song on CD probably around 1985-1986, so it's been 25 years, and my ears weren't as good then as they are now, but my recollection is that the difference between the 45 and CD speed at the beginning of the song was definitely noticeable but minor - and by the end of the song, the 45 seemed a lot faster than the CD.

Unfortunately, I don't know where the 45 is now. But perhaps someone like Jim has one he can share with you for reference.

Edited by EdisonLite
Back to Top
aaronk View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 84
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote aaronk Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 December 2010 at 7:47pm
Hopefully someone with the actual 45 can help answer your question,
EdisonLite. I figured it probably wasn't the key change, but it doesn't
hurt to ask. One other possibility, if you're recalling what you heard on
the radio, is that someone carted it up while gradually increasing the
turntable speed. I remember one instance of this happening on the
local top 40 station where I lived back in '85. It was the extended
version of Oh Sheila. Years later, when I got my first radio job, it made
sense why the station gradually sped up the song. That station used
to play everything from cart. Carts were made in different lengths, one
of them being 6 1/2 minutes. My guess is that the music director
attempted to fit a 6:48 song onto a 6:30 cart!
Back to Top
EdisonLite View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 18 October 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote EdisonLite Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 December 2010 at 9:05pm
Aaron, no I wasn't recalling what I heard on the radio. It was definitely a comparison of 45 to LP.
Back to Top
crapfromthepast View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan
Avatar

Joined: 14 September 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote crapfromthepast Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 September 2012 at 6:50pm
Just got to hear a dub of the 45. The dub runs about 49.3 BPM throughout, with a few edits but no tempo drift. That's about 2.3% faster than the LP versions on CD. I didn't play the 45 on my Technics 1200, so I can't guarantee that 49.3 BPM is the exact tempo, but there wasn't any tempo drift.

Edited by crapfromthepast
There's a lot of crap on the radio, but there's only one Crap From The Past.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.07
Copyright ©2001-2024 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.125 seconds.