![]() |
"Hurricane" - Bob Dylan |
Post Reply
|
Page 123> |
| Author | ||
sriv94
Music Fan
Joined: 16 September 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: "Hurricane" - Bob DylanPosted: 25 May 2006 at 2:54pm |
|
|
OK, here's one. Dylan's on my mind since his birthday was yesterday (same as my mother's).
Is the 45 just a straight fade of the full-length version, or is it an edit as well as being faded early? Also, is the 45 uncensored like the LP (I'm assuming, which is dangerous, that a censored radio version was put out)? |
||
|
Doug
--------------- All of the good signatures have been taken. |
||
![]() |
||
eric_a
Music Fan
Joined: 29 June 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 May 2006 at 3:12pm |
|
|
If I recall correctly, the commercial 45 broke the song up into parts 1 and 2. Whitburn lists Part 2 as the single. I seem to remember that side fading in on one of the instrumental interludes between verses.
Edited by eric_a |
||
![]() |
||
Gary Mack
Music Fan
Joined: 06 February 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 May 2006 at 3:50pm |
|
|
While I don't have the stock 45, I do have two different double-sided, 7" promo singles. One, a 45, has the 3:45 stereo and mono edited mixes. The other, a 33 1/3 without the large spindle hole, is a 8:34 stereo/mono full length version. I don't remember which one was played, for neither my station nor most others aired it.
GM |
||
![]() |
||
edtop40
Music Fan
Joined: 29 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 13 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 May 2006 at 8:12pm |
|
|
doug.........do you need a copy of the commercial 45 for your review???
|
||
|
edtop40
|
||
![]() |
||
Paul Haney
Music Fan
Joined: 01 April 2005 Status: Offline Points: 48 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 May 2006 at 5:46am |
|
Actually, Whitburn lists Part 1 as the single. |
||
![]() |
||
sriv94
Music Fan
Joined: 16 September 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 May 2006 at 7:08am |
|
Not necessarily, Ed, if you can tell me if I simulated the 45 properly. I made the point of stoppage the (3:44) mark, I started the fade at about (3:37), and left the S-word in. If I'm close, then I don't need the 45. If I'm way off, then it wouldn't hurt to have it (unless it would just be easier to tell me where I went astray). |
||
|
Doug
--------------- All of the good signatures have been taken. |
||
![]() |
||
eric_a
Music Fan
Joined: 29 June 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 May 2006 at 12:46pm |
|
Wow, I stand corrected. I think I was confusing that with Chicago's "Dialogue". Are there many other 2-part hits, where Part II was the hit? I can think of Gary Glitter's "Rock and Roll" and Cozy Cole - Topsy. Were there many others? |
||
![]() |
||
sriv94
Music Fan
Joined: 16 September 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 May 2006 at 12:53pm |
|
Probably wasn't "Dialogue." The 45 version is an edit of the LP version (not merely a fade). The version on Chicago's Greatest Hits, Volume 2 CD wasn't the 45 (the 45 is gettable on a couple of the Rhino releases). Edited by sriv94 |
||
|
Doug
--------------- All of the good signatures have been taken. |
||
![]() |
||
Todd Ireland
Music Fan
Joined: 16 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 23 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 May 2006 at 12:55pm |
|
|
Pink Floyd's "Another Brick in the Wall (Part 2)" comes to mind. Overall, it doesn't appear there are very many "part 2" Top 40 hits.
|
||
![]() |
||
eric_a
Music Fan
Joined: 29 June 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 May 2006 at 1:05pm |
|
I could've sworn that Whitburn called that Part II, but I see that's wrong too...he calls it Parts I & II. Wow - I am batting poorly today. :) |
||
![]() |
||
Post Reply
|
Page 123> |
| Tweet |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |