![]() |
Gerry Rafferty Singles |
Post Reply
|
Page 123 4> |
| Author | ||
sriv94
Music Fan
Joined: 16 September 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: Gerry Rafferty SinglesPosted: 13 January 2006 at 8:13am |
|
|
Always enjoyed Gerry Rafferty's work--and for a long time the (4:08) 45 version of "Baker Street" was one of the hardest to track down on CD. Now I'd like to try to edit his other three LP versions on CD to match the 45 (strangely enough, "Days Gone Down" is still not available on CD while his other top-40 hits are)--that is, of course, when my computer gets repaired.
I did create one edit of "Right Down The Line" from a somewhat scratchy 45 put onto a CD for me--but because it's somewhat scratchy I'm not sure if I nailed the edits (converting the LP to a 45 also requires a slightly faster change in speed/pitch). But for "Home And Dry" and "Get It Right Next Time" I haven't a clue about edits or pitch/speed. Anyone have any insight? Edited by sriv94 |
||
|
Doug
--------------- All of the good signatures have been taken. |
||
![]() |
||
edtop40
Music Fan
Joined: 29 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 15 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 January 2006 at 10:38am |
|
|
i have all 5 of his top 40 hits on cd, but NOT in the 45 versions........i have a few that paul re-created in their 45 versions on cd.......can i send mps of them to your for your review.........i also have the actual 45's of all 5 top 40 songs as well....if you need them
|
||
|
edtop40
|
||
![]() |
||
Roscoe
Music Fan
Joined: 18 July 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 January 2006 at 10:43am |
|
|
"Get It Right Next Time" has a lousy-sounding fade-in for the 45 version. I recreated it, but it sounds sloppy, just like the 45. I can't remember if this one required a speed adjustment like the City to City singles did.
|
||
![]() |
||
sriv94
Music Fan
Joined: 16 September 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 January 2006 at 11:05am |
|
I'll take you up on that, but I'll let you know when (once my home computer is repaired). Thanks! :) |
||
|
Doug
--------------- All of the good signatures have been taken. |
||
![]() |
||
sriv94
Music Fan
Joined: 16 September 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 January 2006 at 11:07am |
|
Interesting. Is that the only difference between the 45 and LP for "Get It Right Next Time," or are there others? |
||
|
Doug
--------------- All of the good signatures have been taken. |
||
![]() |
||
edtop40
Music Fan
Joined: 29 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 15 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 January 2006 at 11:22am |
|
|
ok let me know
|
||
|
edtop40
|
||
![]() |
||
Roscoe
Music Fan
Joined: 18 July 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 January 2006 at 7:22pm |
|
A chunk of the long instrumental outro has also been edited out, but I can't remember where the edit is. I don't think there's a speed adjustment, though. I just listened to the fade-in from the 45 version again. It starts at about the :31 second mark and the full fade-in only takes for about 1 second. That's why it sounds so sloppy. |
||
![]() |
||
Paul Esch
Music Fan
Joined: 15 August 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 January 2006 at 8:38am |
|
|
For the single version of "Right Down The Line," edit the introduction
from 0:08 to 0:23, using the cowbell hit as the marker. After that, edit the guitar solo from 2:25 to 2:40, using the normal beats. After that edit out the end of the track from 3:42 on. Then go back and add a fade-out from just after the last big piano chord to the end. The fade-out is at first gradual then drops quickly from 3:37 on, so use a 'convex' curve on the fade-out. After that, speed up the track to 105%, and that should do it. (The time markers are rounded to the nearest second, but you'll be able to use the beats to determine the edits.) I'm working on single versions for "Days Gone Down" and "Get It RIght Next Time". The single version of "Days" is not only edited but repeats and tags on the second chorus to the end of the track. |
||
![]() |
||
sriv94
Music Fan
Joined: 16 September 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 January 2006 at 9:34am |
|
|
Thanks, Paul, for the update. Unfortunately, some of the jargon is new to me--what is a "convex" curve?
|
||
|
Doug
--------------- All of the good signatures have been taken. |
||
![]() |
||
Paul Esch
Music Fan
Joined: 15 August 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 January 2006 at 10:26am |
|
|
It just means that if you have a special fade designer on your sound
program, instead of a striaght-line fade, you adjust the fade to be flatter at the beginning, then gradually becoming steeper to the end, so it appears to be an arc (a convex, or curved, line). 'Convex' is my term; I don't know what the official jargon would be. |
||
![]() |
||
Post Reply
|
Page 123 4> |
| Tweet |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |