Top 40 Music on CD Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Top 40 Music On Compact Disc > Chat Board
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Peter Brown-"Dance With Me"
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Peter Brown-"Dance With Me"

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message
jimct View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 07 April 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jimct Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Peter Brown-"Dance With Me"
    Posted: 28 April 2008 at 9:51am
My commercial 45 has a listed time of (3:45), but an actual time of (3:41). Unfortunately, all current database CDs for this song that state "45 version" have run times ranging between (3:46) and (3:48).
Back to Top
Todd Ireland View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 16 October 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 23
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Todd Ireland Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 April 2008 at 11:16am
As irritating as it can be when CD run times don't match the length of their vinyl 45 and LP counterparts, I think pretty much every die-hard 45-version-on-CD collector would have to agree it's far preferable to have the song run a bit longer on CD where it can be custom faded to match the 45 than to have the song faded out on CD too soon and thus missing the closing seconds of 45 audio altogether!
Back to Top
AndrewChouffi View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 24 September 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 24
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AndrewChouffi Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 April 2008 at 11:27am
The song ends cold; is it a pitch difference?

Andy
Back to Top
Todd Ireland View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 16 October 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 23
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Todd Ireland Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 April 2008 at 11:52am
Ah, good question, Andy. I forgot about the cold ending.
Back to Top
abagon View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 01 March 2008
Location: Japan
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote abagon Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 April 2008 at 6:57am
I compared the 45 (Drive 6269) with the CD (Rhino 72130 Soul Hits Of The 70's Vol. 20). As a result, there is a pitch difference.I used my software(STEINBURG "Clean3.0") and the CD's music file approximately corresponded to the 45's music file when the pitch level was upped at +12.
Back to Top
jimct View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 07 April 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jimct Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 April 2008 at 8:50am
Abagon, I don't have the software you do, so I usually can't get to the bottom of my own questions. To me, the info you just provided here is worth its weight in gold. Many thanks for your excellent analysis!
Back to Top
eriejwg View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan
Avatar

Joined: 10 June 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 69
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote eriejwg Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 April 2008 at 12:14pm
Pitched my copy up +3% and the resulting file runs 3:41.
Back to Top
abagon View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 01 March 2008
Location: Japan
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote abagon Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 April 2008 at 12:30am
Thank you for your response, Jim.

About my above post:
(STEINBURG "Clean3.0") is incorrect.
(STEINBERG "Clean3.0") is correct!.
sorry,abagon
Back to Top
crapfromthepast View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan
Avatar

Joined: 14 September 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 58
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote crapfromthepast Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 April 2008 at 7:27am
With regard to the pitch/tempo differences:

I have the 45 version on Rhino's The Disco Years Vol. 1 (1990), where it runs 109.0 BPM. There are digital clones of this mastering on Rhino's cheapie Disco Hits Vol. 2, and on Time-Life's Seventies Dance Party 1978-1979 (which has a different EQ than the other two) - both are also 109.0 BPM.

I have the LP version on Priority's Mega Hits Dance Classics Vol. 6, where it runs 111.8 BPM.

That's a difference of 2.5%.

I don't have the 45 handy (it's at home in a very large, unsorted box), but I tend to think that the Rhino CD has the proper pitch/tempo. This wouldn't be the first time that a Disco Years track is much slower than a Mega Hits Dance Classics track - "Disco Nights (Rock-Freak)" by GQ is 126.5 BPM on MHDC, but 123.2 BPM on DY and its Time-Life digital clones.

Edited by crapfromthepast
Back to Top
Todd Ireland View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 16 October 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 23
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Todd Ireland Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 March 2009 at 8:46am
Pat:

Just wanted to bring this thread back up because the database was never updated with Jim's commercial 45 run time info for Peter Brown's "Dance with Me" (The actual run time is 3:41, not 3:45 as stated on the record label). Also, it appears all CDs with a "45 version" comment should be amended to read "45 version but slower".
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.07
Copyright ©2001-2024 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.063 seconds.