![]() |
single edits vs. single mixes |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 12> |
Author | |
EdisonLite ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 18 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 211 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 15 May 2005 at 6:30pm |
Can anyone tell me whether these singles differ from the albums due to editing, or mixing, or early fading?
Lonesome Loser - Little River Band Leave a Light On - Belinda Carlisle Love Changes (Everything) - Climie Fischer September Morn - Neil Diamond We Could Be Together - Debbie Gibson American Storm - Bob Seger I Could Not Ask For More - Edwin McCain (I know the mix is different but how is it shorter -- edit or early fade?) Edited by EdisonLite |
|
![]() |
|
Paul Esch ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 15 August 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sorry to take so long to respond. The 45 version of "American
Storm" is 4:00, compared to the LP version, which is 4:18. There is an edit at approximately 3:21, in which about 15 seconds is cut, and then the 45 version begins its fade with 25 seconds to go. Hope this helps. |
|
![]() |
|
sriv94 ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 16 September 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
"Lonesome Loser" and "September Morn" are edits (if memory serves, take the piano intro off of "September Morn" [leaving the chord right before Diamond's vocal] to replicate the 45).
I tried replicating LRB's "Lonesome Loser" edit, but I'm not sure if I quite nailed it (there are two edits to be made; I think I got one but I'm not sure of the other). The one LRB single I've had trouble with is "The Night Owls" (two edits and an early fade, but I can't seem to remember the second edit--and radio stations here usually play the LP version). Again, working without a turntable I'm at a disadvantage. Any advice? Doug Edited by sriv94 |
|
![]() |
|
Paul Esch ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 15 August 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The two edits for "Lonesome Loser are during the intro, after the
opening vocals; the high voice part is edited out from about :23 to :33 so just the higher vocal of the two remains. Then the other edit is near the end, where they start repeating "Have you heard about the lonesome loser" only; the second one is edited out. From there, the song fades from 3:17 to the end at 3:29,so you'll need to fade early from the LP version. |
|
![]() |
|
sriv94 ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 16 September 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Boy, you're good. As luck would have it, there's an unscoped aircheck on Reelradio with the 45 version of "Lonesome Loser." The edits are as you describe them, although the edit at the end goes from the first "have you heard" to the guitar break following the second "have you heard." (Just in case you want to try replicating at home. :) ) Well done. As an aside, unfortunately, the DJ does a little monkeying around with the cart (and the end comes way too abruptly) so the unscoped aircheck is not clean for just extracting the 45 right off of it. Now, anyone got ideas on how to replicate "The Night Owls" single? Doug |
|
![]() |
|
aaronk ![]() Admin Group ![]() Joined: 16 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 208 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yes, I can help out with that. Per my TM Century disc, here are the edits:
1) The intro is cut in half with the edit points right before the drum/cymbol hit at 6 1/2 seconds, and that same "hit" right before the first vocals. 2) If you're listening to the LP version (no edits), the next edit would splice out 2:26 to 2:42 on the first count of that measure. If you've already made the first edit, then the next edit would be at 2:19. 3) After making the first two edits, remove all audio past 3:51. Make your bell-curve fade out from 3:33 to 3:51. Again, I don't have the actual 45 to check, but I'm pretty sure this one is correct on my TM disc. |
|
![]() |
|
aaronk ![]() Admin Group ![]() Joined: 16 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 208 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Doug, in response to your post about the "Lonesome Loser" edit... I pulled out my TM Century disc for this one, too. I'm not sure if TM just did a sloppy job, or if the actual 45 version has bad edits. On theirs, they made the first edit on the high hat hit right before the vocal, rather than right on the "ooooh."
But the worst one is the second one. After the first "have you heard..." they made the edit on the snare hit, which then cuts to the second guitar break. You can hear the tail end of the reverb from the second "have you heard..." where the edit is, but it sounds choppy on my disc, like they made the edit a split second too soon instead of right on the snare hit. Does your copy sound like that also? Edited by aaronk |
|
![]() |
|
sriv94 ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 16 September 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
To be honest I'm not sure (again, I'm working with a radio station aircheck version). The edit I wound up making sounds pretty smooth (may not be an exact match, but it's pretty darn close to what I heard on the aircheck). Again, I can't A/B it with anything because I'm not working with vinyl. If it'll help, I'll be happy to forward you a copy for comparison purposes (don't know if that's against board policy, but I might as well ask). As to "The Night Owls," I'll give it a shot. Thanks for the tip, AaronK. :) Doug |
|
![]() |
|
sriv94 ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 16 September 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mega mega thanks. I think I got it. Doug |
|
![]() |
|
aaronk ![]() Admin Group ![]() Joined: 16 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 208 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Doug, no need to forward the "Lonesome Loser" edit. I re-edited the song myself, and my edits are much smoother than the ones on the TM Century disc. They probably just did a sloppy job.
|
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 12> |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |