![]() |
"Always and Forever" - Heatwave |
Post Reply
|
| Author | |
Todd Ireland
Music Fan
Joined: 16 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 23 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: "Always and Forever" - HeatwavePosted: 03 June 2009 at 2:42pm |
|
The actual commercial 45 run time of Heatwave's "Always and Forever" is 3:31. (Thanks to Jim for providing the timing info. The printed record label time is 3:32.) Currently, database CDs of this song containing a "45 version" comment range from 3:29-3:39.
|
|
![]() |
|
aaronk
Admin Group
Joined: 16 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 260 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 March 2012 at 11:18am |
|
The reason that times range on CD is because there are two different edits! So, we either have two different 45 versions, or we have one version on CD that is not correct.
The first edit appears on "Didn't It Blow Your Mind Vol. 19" and the other edit is on "Can You Dig It (Box Set)." They are the same up until the 1:28 mark. Edit #1 lyrics at 1:25ish I'll always love you There'll always be sunshine Edit #2 lyrics at same place I'll always love you Forever There is a definite edit at 1:28 on the first version, whereas the second version has the edit at 1:38. This is what accounts for the timing difference. The rest of the song is the same from that point forward. Which one is correct? |
|
![]() |
|
jimct
Music Fan
Joined: 07 April 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 March 2012 at 12:15pm |
|
Aaron, I just pulled out my 1978 stock 45, listened at the 1:25-ish mark, and
he sings "I'll always love you", and then nothing. After a brief interlude of music, the next verse of vocal resumes with "there'll always be sunshine". I just popped in my "Didn't It Blow Your MInd, Vol. 19" CD (the older of the two CDs, produced by Bill Inglot), and it sounds just like my 45 at that point. I heard Rhino canned Inglot some years ago for "paying too much attention to detail". Apparently, this "we don't care" philosophy bit 'em in the butt on the post-Inglot-era "Can You Dig It" box! |
|
![]() |
|
aaronk
Admin Group
Joined: 16 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 260 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 March 2012 at 9:03pm |
|
Thank you, Jim, for confirming that the Can You Dig It box set has a bogus edit. I think there are a couple other database CDs that run 3:38, so those may be incorrect, too.
|
|
![]() |
|
The Hits Man
Music Fan
Joined: 04 February 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 March 2012 at 11:31pm |
|
I understand Inglot got canned along with hundreds of
others when Warner did their blood-letting, not because of his obsessiveness with detail. Besides, Bill has gotten a LOT of things wrong on the many CDs he had done for Rhino. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
jimct
Music Fan
Joined: 07 April 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 March 2012 at 3:35am |
|
Grant, if you must know, my old college roommate in CT later went on to
spend many years in Cali working for Rhino; we kept in touch. Furthermore, another long-time friend of mine had regularly corresponded with Inglot during his Rhino years, and he'd kindly shared the gist of what they'd discussed with me, as a fellow interested audiophile. How many folks in Inglot's position at the time would've both read, and then personally taken the time to reply to an individual consumer, addressing both his compliments/complaints of his work, on more than one occasion? Very few, I'd say. Grant, are your sources both multiple, and as close to the Rhino/Inglot situation at the time as mine? Hmmm.... Yes, there were massive firings when WB first bought out Rhino. It happened, and was/is fairly common industry knowledge. To me, your reply sounds like you were sitting in on Mr. Inglot's annual Rhino performance reviews (which I have my doubts about) to speak with such confidence about his dismissal. Grant, it is clear that you are not a fan of Bill Inglot's work, and you are certainly entitled to your opinion. The late 80's/early 90's were chock full of audio issues for him, during construction of the Have A Nice Day/Soul Hits Of The 70's V/A CD series. I won't bore you, but you'd be amazed to discover that when Inglot asked many of the licensees for the "best available quality 45 version master" for an old hit song, it was like he was speaking Portugese! He often initially got LP versions, alternate versions, wrong edits, or hissy, late-generation dubs instead. Follow-up calls to these "middlemen" were the norm. And all while having to work within Rhino's "we've scheduled the CD's release date for xx/xx, so let's please hurry it up on Vol. xx, Bill!" Can you say "rock and a hard place?" Yes, some errors do appear on his work, but I always admired his overall efforts, then and now. I truly believe no human being could've done a better job with them than him on those series, given the numerous roadblocks/time constraints he was under. The "Always And Forever" example (this thread) is just another example of his good work. His successors at Rhino weren't even smart enough to re- cycle his correct 45 version for their "Can You Dig It?" box; instead, they replaced his correct version with their own incorrect version. You can keep these new guys, Grant, OK! Inglot wasn't perfect, but I'd welcome him back in my "oldies audio trenches" anytime! |
|
|
jimct
|
|
![]() |
|
The Hits Man
Music Fan
Joined: 04 February 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 March 2012 at 7:38am |
Well, first of all, you can tone down your patronizing tone. Second, you assume wrong. I have always been a fan of Inglot's work. If I wasn't, I wouldn't have bought almost anything with his name on it. His name meant quality. And, I am well aware of his, what was once described as "pestering" the vault people for the correct tapes. This is why he has gotten things wrong on CDs, because he had deadlines and other pressures to get the job done. In other words, he cared, when when it was not the corporate way to care. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
prisdeej
Music Fan
Joined: 02 July 2011 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 16 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 March 2012 at 12:10pm |
|
The version used on TM Century's GoldDisc3 is incorrect as well, but
this doesn't surprise me. |
|
|
DJ L.
|
|
![]() |
|
jono
Music Fan
Joined: 26 September 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 5 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 March 2012 at 2:07pm |
|
Thank you, Jim, for sharing this info you found. I'm glad I kept my "Didn't It Blow Your Mind" series even after I'd bought the "Can You Dig It?" box.
I couldn't have said it better than you regarding Bill Inglot. Just seeing his name on the credits of a cd almost always made it worth purchasing. Jon O. |
|
![]() |
|
LunarLaugh
Music Fan
Joined: 13 February 2020 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 70 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 March 2022 at 2:37pm |
|
Hey all. What are the edit points to re-create the 45 edit
using the long LP version? |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
|
| Tweet |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |