![]() |
Wondering, why an obsession about... |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 123 5> |
Author | |
budaniel ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 12 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 10 November 2005 at 10:24am |
Hey all. Just curious. Why are so many determined to recreate single edits
of songs? Ever since I was a little kid, and first discovered that very often my 45s and K-tel records included EDITS of album versions (I think I first became aware of the situation when I got a full length Village People LP-- only to find my favorite hits were much longer than on my K-tel records!), my focus has always been to make sure I have the full length version of a song as it was originally recorded by the artist. Not to say single "mixes" aren't important to me sometimes (for instance, the single of "Look What You've Done To Me" by Boz Scaggs includes instrumentation not in the LP mix), but the idea of an "edit" has always made me feel ripped off! :-) |
|
![]() |
|
EdisonLite ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 18 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 203 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
<the single of "Look What
You've Done To Me" by Boz Scaggs includes instrumentation not in the LP mix)> Do you recall what other instrumentation was in that mix? I simply made an edit of the album version and THOUGHT that I had the single version! But to answer your question, having made some single edits (though not as many as some of the other people on this board), I think for many people they want to hear the version they grew up with, the version they always knew from the radio. Certainly with single MIXES, they were generally done to sound better and usually contain MORE instrumentation, but why people would want the edited versions of recordings -- I think it's familiarity. In some cases, the long versions have slowed down sections that don't "feel" like a regular part of the song, like Roger Hodgson's "Had a Dream" -- or just completely different sections. I can only compare it to visiting an old friend -- if you went to visit a friend you hadn't seen in a couple years, and all of a sudden he had a third arm, you'd say, "Get rid of that extra arm!" |
|
![]() |
|
edtop40 ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 29 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 6 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
myself.........i'm trying to get every top 40 song as it appeared on the charts in it's 45/cassingle/cd sgl version in a digital format.....just my hobby.....as far as an esthetic reason, i DO like the short songs..........my feeling is if you can't say what you have to say in 2 to 3 minutes, your wasting my time.......i have no need for 6, 7, or 10 minute songs......
|
|
edtop40
|
|
![]() |
|
aaronk ![]() Admin Group ![]() Joined: 16 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 178 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I agree for the same reasons, especially the point of familiarity that Edisonlite brings up. Also, most of us already have the longer LP versions of these songs, but we want the 45 versions, too. Like Edtop40 said, we're collectors, and some of us are just trying to "complete" our collections by having both the LP and/or 45 versions of songs.
|
|
![]() |
|
budaniel ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 12 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
by default, due to so many compilation purchases, I also have both the
single and album versions in many cases. Occasionally, an edit seems better--take for instance the LP version of Abacab by Genesis--ugh! The single definitely gets to the point! Of course, I guess part of it for me is a focus on dance music. But a lot of single edits cut out verses, vocal ad libs and things such as that--that to me goes beyond just having say an instrumental intro that's twice as long. Now, for the boz Scaggs dilemma--in the single version (which I still have on a K-tel album called The Elite--but really want on CD because the vinyl pressing was not very good), I believe it's in the break between the first chorus and the next verse, there is what I guess you could call a sort of "twanging" instrumentation that is totally missing from the album version! That's the only reason I still have that k-tel record in my collection, because every other song on it was long ago replaced on CD. |
|
![]() |
|
sriv94 ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 16 September 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I have a couple of CDs with a long version. They do feature a guitar solo during the break between the first chorus and second verse (the solo is repeated in the break between the second chorus and the reprised chorus--much of which was edited out in the single version). Does that mean that these CDs don't have the true LP version? Now that you mention it, I do recall hearing a version on the radio many years ago without a guitar solo (which was not edited). I can't add anything that hasn't already been said on your other initial question. |
|
Doug
--------------- All of the good signatures have been taken. |
|
![]() |
|
budaniel ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 12 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
anyone else have the 45 who could clarify what I'm trying to say? The
instrumental break is just completely different on that version as compared to the LP version. We might have to start a separate "Look What You've Done To Me" topic to clear this one up.... |
|
![]() |
|
budaniel ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 12 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
ok, I listened at home, and at approximately the 1:50 mark on the single version of "Look What You've Done to Me", the chorus ends and bleeds into a twangy guitar. On the LP version, the chorus background vocals almost fade out into silence, and a very quiet piano then takes over. The twangy guitar finally shows up for the last few notes.
|
|
![]() |
|
JMD1961 ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 29 March 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 13 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'm coming into this one a little late, but felt I should comment on the single/album version discussion.
A lot of my desire to have the 45 version of a song is due to a personal project that I'm working on. Basically, I'm making my own "time-life" series, only trying to one up them, but including ALL the hits from each year. Not just the soft rock, pop, country, R&B and various other styles, but all of them together, just as they appeared on the charts. So, with the 45 versions, I kill two birds with one stone. First, I get the version that actually charted. And second, since singles generally ran shorter than album tracks, I can get the most "bang for my buck" per CD. |
|
![]() |
|
sriv94 ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 16 September 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hmmm. As stated before, I have two CDs that Pat cites as having the LP version of that song (one runs (5:14), the other (5:12)). In both cases, that guitar solo appears in the break that you mentioned (the guitar solo is also reprised in the break that would've been excised by the single version). There's a CD with a (5:27) version, which is the Urban Cowboy soundtrack CD. I wonder if that's the version that you have on vinyl (I don't have that CD to note whether or not guitars appear, plus it's 13-15 seconds longer than the other commercially-available versions). And was there a Boz Scaggs LP that had the song that might account for the (5:1x) version (which would have spawned the (4:11) edit)? Edited by sriv94 |
|
Doug
--------------- All of the good signatures have been taken. |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 123 5> |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |