![]() |
Whistling Jack Smith-"I Was Kaiser..." |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <12 |
Author | |
Yah Shure ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 11 December 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Well, the folks at Jubilee Records certainly thought so! Take one part "Ding Dong The Witch Is Dead" (the label's big hit that year - hey, it worked once!) and add one part "I Was Kaiser Bill's Batman." Graft the results onto Mats Olsson's 1965 Swedish instrumental "Lappland," and the resulting Frankenstein by The Baltimore & Ohio Marching Band skyrockets all the way to... number 94!!! How could it have failed? Must've been that kazoo! By comparison, it almost makes Pat Boone look like he knew what he was doing. :) |
|
![]() |
|
Yah Shure ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 11 December 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Steve, the first U.S. Deram 45 (#7501) was Cat Stevens' 1966 #118 bubbler, "I Love My Dog." My promo copy was also printed on the standard London/Parrot/Press, et al. orange swirl promo label, using only plain block "DERAM" letters for a logo. This is strictly a guess, but it could be that, unlike the color-intensive Parrot & Press stock labels, the Deram stock label had a significant amount of plain white background, perhaps enough so that less ink was used on the stocks than on the initial run of 1966-early '67 orange-swirl Deram promos. Too bad Stevens didn't cut this one as "Walkin' My Dog Named Cat." :) BTW, for whatever reason Deram utilized concurrent 45 numbering systems - the 7500 and 85000 series - by the time my promo copy of Stevens' Matthew And Son" (7505) bubbled under in March of '67, it was already on the more familiar brown and white promo label . This was over a month before Whistling Jack Smith (85005) charted. Looks like there was some overlap. Edited by Yah Shure |
|
![]() |
|
Todd Ireland ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 16 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 23 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Jim, I'm delighted to hear you've resumed your 1967 research and long-term goal to uncover more vinyl 45 "listed vs. actual" run time discrepencies! As you well know, this information is especially valuable to those of us seeking 45 versions on CD in their correct lengths. I currently have questions regarding run time info for numerous '50s and '60s Top 40 hits, so I will look forward to picking your brain as well as that of other message board members having expertise in this era! Edited by Todd Ireland |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <12 |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |