|
crash test dummies "mmm mmm mmm..." |
Post Reply 
|
| Author | |
edtop40 
Music Fan 
Joined: 29 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 14 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply
 Topic: crash test dummies "mmm mmm mmm..."Posted: 09 September 2009 at 3:37pm |
|
my commercial cassingle issued as arista 12654 does not list a version nor run time but is actually the full length cd/lp version which runs 3:54.....there is a shorter 3:45 running length db entry and my speculation is that the crickets during the fade out are faded out extra early....
|
|
|
edtop40
|
|
 |
|
|
aaronk
Admin Group
Joined: 16 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 263 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 September 2009 at 8:43am |
|
I think I have the promo CD to this song somewhere. If I find it, I'll post details. I suspect the early faded version was on the promo CD, since I do not recall the sound effects at the end being heard on the air back in 1994.
|
|
|
|
|
aaronk
Admin Group
Joined: 16 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 263 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 September 2009 at 10:49am |
|
As it turns out, the CD single we had in the air studio, which I snagged after we stopped playing it, was a 3-track commercial Arista single with no artwork. Apparently, we must have always started the next song before you could hear the crickets, because even my TM Century GoldDisc runs an actual 3:52 with the crickets on the end.
|
|
|
|
|
LunarLaugh
Music Fan
Joined: 13 February 2020 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 72 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 17 hours 52 minutes ago at 2:40pm |
|
My US ARISTA 3-track CD single (07822-12666-2) includes the album mix of MMM MMM MMM MMM but runs just ever so slightly faster than it does on the God Shuffled His Feet CD. Just about 9.7% faster, to be exact. Very subtle difference and otherwise, apart from the audio level and the fadeout on the crickets sound effects at the end, the mastering on the single seems pretty much identical to the album version.
Edited by LunarLaugh - 17 hours 48 minutes ago at 2:44pm |
|
|
|
|
aaronk
Admin Group
Joined: 16 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 263 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 hours 55 minutes ago at 3:37pm |
|
I assume you mean .97% and not 9.7%, which would certainly be approaching Chipmunk speeds!
|
|
|
|
|
LunarLaugh
Music Fan
Joined: 13 February 2020 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 72 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 hours 19 minutes ago at 4:13pm |
|
In the "change speed" fuction on audacity, I raised the speed of the album version by 0.097 to match the CD single. I figured to convert 0.097 to a percentage would mean simply multiplying it by 100 which is 9.7%. Apologies if that was the cause of confusion.
|
|
|
|
|
aaronk
Admin Group
Joined: 16 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 263 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 hours 36 minutes ago at 4:56pm |
|
Ok, then the speed change is even smaller. I just did the same in Cool Edit Pro, and the CD single is 0.103% faster, which is pretty insignificant. By the end of the song, the two files are only out of sync by about 2/10 of a second.
|
|
|
|
|
crapfromthepast
Music Fan
Joined: 14 September 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 162 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 14 hours 23 minutes ago at 6:09pm |
|
All the versions I have are either 92.9 BPM or 93.0 BPM. (Live drummer playing to a click track.)
Most definitely an insignificant difference. |
|
|
There's a lot of crap on the radio, but there's only one Crap From The Past.
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
| Tweet |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Topic Options