Top 40 Music on CD Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Top 40 Music On Compact Disc > Chat Board
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Glenn Miller - In The Mood
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Glenn Miller - In The Mood

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>
Author
Message
Brian W. View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 13 October 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 17
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Brian W. Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31 May 2021 at 9:51pm
Originally posted by PopArchivist PopArchivist wrote:

I think anything from the 1940's, especially the early part of the decade comes from 78 transfers.


Yeah, recording tape didn't exist for commercial use in the U.S. until 1948 (we got tape recorders from the Nazis and brought them back to the U.S.) and were not regularly used by the record companies until 1949. One of the earlier pop hits that was recorded on tape was Frankie Laine's "That Lucky Old Sun" in mid-1949. (Which is curious, since it was for Mercury Records, and Mercury continued to record primarily onto lacquer disc until 1953.)

For these reasons, most songs prior to 1950 are going to be from either 78s, original lacquer discs (which is what they were actually recorded on), or metal stamper masters that were used to press the 78s. There is not (and never was) a master tape for any record before 1949.


Edited by Brian W.
Back to Top
Paul Haney View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan
Avatar

Joined: 01 April 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 40
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Paul Haney Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 June 2021 at 2:36am
I also have a big interest in the pre-1955 music. In fact, I've been methodically adding the Cash Box regional DJ Top
10 charts to the ARSA database. There are TONS of songs there that never made the Billboard charts, and many by big
name artists too. My Mom grew up in that era and many of her all-time favorite songs are from 1950-54.
Back to Top
Hykker View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 30 October 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 21
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Hykker Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 June 2021 at 6:30am
Originally posted by PopArchivist PopArchivist wrote:


That's because most people outside the Hit Parade and
comp series that were put out don't have an interest
in the era before 1955. When CD was first coming out
those people who wanted the 1940's and early 1950's
were only 35-45 years old and had disposable income
for CD's.

Now that same age group is 75-85 and those kind of
compilations don't see the light of day anymore on CD
since they make nothing for the labels.


I'd say the audience for that era is older than
that...my mother graduated high school in 1945, which
would put her right in the middle of the "hit parade"
era, and she's 94! I'd say the 75-85 age group would
be more first generation rock & rollers.

Originally posted by BSharp BSharp wrote:

As much as I can appreciate the Big
Band Era, my 1970s-
era ears would rather hear a clean, note-perfect
recording of a big band song vs. an original version
dubbed from a 78-RPM record.


I see what you're saying, but that's like saying that
the remakes of rock era songs (Roy Orbison's "In
Dreams" collection, the Everly Brothers' re-recordings
of their Cadence hits for WB, Chubby Checker re-
recorded his hits in stereo, etc.) are "superior" to
the originals. Maybe to someone who's never heard the
originals they're OK, but to anyone who "was there"
they just sound "off".

Granted, it's a different situation with a the pre-50s
material and a lot of the originals are long gone (or
the few copies that still exist sound "well played").
Back to Top
ChicagoBill View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan
Avatar

Joined: 06 November 2019
Location: Utah
Status: Offline
Points: 14
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ChicagoBill Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 June 2021 at 12:17pm
   Hmmmm, Maybe as far as my CEDARS comment, I'm living in the past (Not a bad place to live). When CD's were in their infancy, almost every kind of noise-
reduction meant a compromise in fidelity of the original recording. Kind of like the "Waring fds" product? CEDARS must've improved their product in the last
25 years. As far as my 'origins of de-clicking' software timing, I wonder why the RCA audio engineers didn't de-click 'In The Mood' for the 1991 re-master?
The CD states "ADD". 1) Were they not up to date on the latest technology? 2) They opted out of that option for some reason like "It might affect the sound".
3) They were taking a short-cut and didn't want to take the time to do the work. Or 4) RCA didn't want to spend the money on the technology. As I listen to
the rest of the Glenn Miller CD I mentioned above, "In The Mood" is the track that is in the most need of help even though it is not the oldest. The Glenn
Miller CD only covers 1939-1942, and yet you can tell the recording techniques were getting better by the time you hit 1942. I would think some of us have
heard the Robert Johnson 2-CD set or the Bessie Smith collections which are now coming up on their 100th anniversary. -Bill.
Back to Top
crapfromthepast View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan
Avatar

Joined: 14 September 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 56
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote crapfromthepast Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 June 2021 at 12:50pm
I myself haven't been a fan of CEDAR (used on the Steely Dan Citizen box set in 1993), NoNoise (plaguing the entire 1980s output of the TM Century library), or noise reduction in general.

But, I haven't dealt much with tracks that really need noise reduction. 1980s-era tracks are just fine as-is. 1970s-era tracks may have a little tape hiss. 1960s-era track may have even more hiss from bouncing tracks to get everything to work with the limited number of multi-track tracks that were available. In my experience, virtually everything from the 1960s onward works just fine without noise reduction.

I understand that using a 78 as source material would be orders of magnitude noisier than the tape-based material that I usually deal with. That's one of the reasons I originally asked for opinions on what works well for these old, pre-tape tracks.

I know that several Robert Johnson sets were released over the years, with varying amounts of noise reduction from set-to-set. I don't know if there was any consensus on what worked best for Robert Johnson's catalog, or whether that would even apply to the 1940s and 1950s tracks that were also lifted from records.

Thanks for the discussion - please keep sharing your thoughts on these older tracks.

Edited by crapfromthepast
There's a lot of crap on the radio, but there's only one Crap From The Past.
Back to Top
NightAire View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 20 February 2010
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote NightAire Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 June 2021 at 2:26pm
Re; CEDAR - CEDAR is very powerful, has lots of options, is expensive to own the full system, and I'm confident can be set to destroy the sound of any recording. I'd certainly want an expert to carefully apply CEDAR to old analog recordings. (I never knew CEDAR was used on a Steely Dan recording! Weird.)

Re; originals vs. re-recordings. The thing that really shocks me about the original performances vs. the stereo re-recordings in later decades, is how much ENERGY and PASSION there was in the original performances, while the re-recordings are technically accurate but the "magic in a bottle" of the original recordings are just gone.

For a perfect example of this, I dare you to find as good a version of "Sing, Sing, Sing" by Benny Goodman as the original release single. Future performances were good, but that first release was on FIRE. I'll put up with sound quality issues to get that kind of energy (the big band & swing of the 30s & 40s was the rock and roll of the era, I'm convinced, and this recording really "rocks!').
Back to Top
AdvprosD View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 12 June 2020
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AdvprosD Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 June 2021 at 8:54pm
Originally posted by crapfromthepast crapfromthepast wrote:

I myself haven't been a fan of CEDAR (used on the Steely Dan Citizen box set in 1993), NoNoise (plaguing the entire 1980s output of the TM Century
library), or noise reduction in general.


I would have never guessed that the Citizen Steely Dan set had anything but some really good examples of NR. I personally own the set, (Have for several years), and
it has been my default Steely Dan collection. I have to assume at this point that there are some of us that really appreciate when the NR is applied in areas where
noise has been a distraction to the content. I got my whole indoctrination to Steely Dan from this box set.

Sure, sure everyone knows all the songs that hit the top 40 charts, but I got a real in depth appreciation for Donald and Walter along with all the session artists that
came with the collection. (And maybe some of the TM Century inventory too.)

The point being that I might have had a different perspective of all those songs, had they not had the NR applied. I guess if I really wanted to buy all the albums that the
collection covered, I can still do that and then decide if the NR was worth the effort. So, maybe it's a good thing you bring up the whole NR conversation on these albums.
It gives me something new to look for should I decide to buy the original albums. But, I probably won't do that.

Thanks Ron, I think we always need to have opinions. It definitely keeps things interesting.
<Dave> Someone please tell I-Heart Radio that St. Louis is not known as The Loo!
Back to Top
vanmeter View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 28 December 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote vanmeter Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 June 2021 at 8:13am
In my humble opinion, the original 78s always sound better if you can find a pressing that isn't noisy. I love the music of the 30s-40s and have quite a bit of it on original shellac, vinyl reissues from the 60s and 70s, with a smattering of CDs from the past 30+ years, and generally the original discs always sound better. 78s are inherently loud with a powerful mid-range and on the right setup can be amazing—albeit not hi-fi, lots-of-treble stereo amazing, but with a midrange that can be incredibly realistic. But that said, I don't mind the lower-fi nature of the recordings in the first place (and I love mono).

Edited by vanmeter
Back to Top
NightAire View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 20 February 2010
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote NightAire Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 June 2021 at 2:37pm
I knew a guy at one point that was pulling audio off the original metal master parts (not the technical term for them, I'm sure, lol) and the sound he was getting from the masters for these old 78s was extraordinary! I was hearing high end I never knew was possible in those decades.

Sadly, I'm not sure anything ever came of the project... or if he's still with us. I'll have to do some digging and see if I still have any samples he sent me and / or if he was able to commercially release what he was capturing.
Back to Top
PopArchivist View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan
Avatar

Joined: 30 June 2018
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 29
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote PopArchivist Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 June 2021 at 3:38pm
Originally posted by vanmeter vanmeter wrote:

In my humble opinion, the original 78s always sound better if you can find a pressing that isn't noisy. I love the music of the 30s-40s and have quite a bit of it on original shellac, vinyl reissues from the 60s and 70s, with a smattering of CDs from the past 30+ years, and generally the original discs always sound better. 78s are inherently loud with a powerful mid-range and on the right setup can be amazing—albeit not hi-fi, lots-of-treble stereo amazing, but with a midrange that can be incredibly realistic. But that said, I don't mind the lower-fi nature of the recordings in the first place (and I love mono).


Your always welcome to join my project. Always looking for good source from that time period. I am not sure they make a 78 player that can produce a .wav file can they? I mean they have turntables that can do it right?
Favorite two expressions to live by on this board: "You can't download vinyl" and "Not everything is available on CD."
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.07
Copyright ©2001-2024 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.047 seconds.