O’Jays - Love Train

Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic

   On my DJ copy, the stereo side matches the label time of 2:59, mono side, while stating 2:59 is actually 2:47. It's sped up a little but faded much sooner, which is the reason for the difference. 

Author	Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic
Bill Cahill Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Music Fan Joined: 27 June 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1	Post Options Post Reply Quote Bill Cahill Thanks(0) Quote Reply Topic: O’Jays - Love Train Posted: 16 November 2010 at 6:18pm
	On my DJ copy, the stereo side matches the label time of 2:59, mono side, while stating 2:59 is actually 2:47. It's sped up a little but faded much sooner, which is the reason for the difference.

jimct Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Music Fan Joined: 07 April 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0	Post Options Post Reply Quote jimct Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: 16 November 2010 at 6:27pm
	Thanks as always, Bill, for sharing this unique DJ 45 finding with us. I think among the very best parts of this board is that when one of us makes a discovery like this, we don't just keep it to ourselves. We go to the extra time & effort to let others know about it as well, even when we're real busy with other life stuff. I doubt I would've ever known of this earlier DJ 45 mono side fade without your kind post here, Bill. Thanks again!

Steve Carras Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Music Fan Joined: 29 July 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0	Post Options Post Reply Quote Steve Carras Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: 15 April 2016 at 12:00am
	Another thing, every mp3 I've ever had of the full length 2-part version has the vocal chorus and instrumental parts interpersing each other, which would naturally be the part two, since the hit part one is largely vocal, pasted on first ahead so that the Part ONE is later, likewise Gary Glitter's "Rock and Roll Parts 1 and 2" (only, of course, part two of Gary's hit was the part two.)
	You know you're really older when you think that younger singer Jesse McCartney's related in anyway to former Beatle Paul McCartney.

The Hits Man Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Music Fan Joined: 04 February 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0	Post Options Post Reply Quote The Hits Man Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: 21 April 2016 at 9:18am
	That mp3 version you have is the extended dance version.


Steve Carras Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Music Fan Joined: 29 July 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0	Post Options Post Reply Quote Steve Carras Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: 24 April 2016 at 10:38am
	Thanks for the information..
	You know you're really older when you think that younger singer Jesse McCartney's related in anyway to former Beatle Paul McCartney.