![]() |
Paul Simon-Graceland |
Post Reply
|
Page <12 |
| Author | |
crapfromthepast
Music Fan
Joined: 14 September 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 168 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 June 2015 at 7:00pm |
|
I got a few questions about this, so I reproduced Aaron's edit, using the remaster of Graceland as the source, and using my notation.
First, pitch up by 0.7%. Then do this: Segment 1 Extends from 0:00.0 to 0:06.5 of the LP/commercial 45 version and the promo 45 edit, after 0.7% pitch increase Ends on a bass drum hit Remove the 32 beats from 0:06.5 to 0:14.6 of the LP/commercial 45 version, after 0.7% pitch increase Segment 2 Begins on a bass drum hit 23 beats long Extends from 0:06.5 to 0:12.3 of the promo 45 edit, after 0.7% pitch increase Extends from 0:14.6 to 0:20.4 of the LP/commercial 45 version, after 0.7% pitch increase Ends on a snare hit Remove the 80 beats from 0:20.4 to 0:40.6 of the LP/commercial 45 version, after 0.7% pitch increase Segment 3 Begins on a snare hit Extends from 0:12.3 to 3:59.4 of the promo 45 edit, after 0.7% pitch increase Extends from 0:40.6 to 4:27.6 of the LP/commercial 45 version, after 0.7% pitch increase Fade 32 beats long Extends from 3:51.3 to 3:59.4 of the promo 45 edit, after 0.7% pitch increase Extends from 4:19.5 to 4:27.6 of the LP/commercial 45 version, after 0.7% pitch increase Your mixdown, after the 0.7% pitch increase, will run 3:59.4, with edits at 0:06.5 and 0:12.3, and a fade from 3:51.3 to 3:59.4. Edited by crapfromthepast |
|
|
There's a lot of crap on the radio, but there's only one Crap From The Past.
|
|
![]() |
|
sriv94
Music Fan
Joined: 16 September 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 June 2015 at 8:45pm |
|
Thanks, Ron. So it appears I hit it pretty close.
|
|
|
Doug
--------------- All of the good signatures have been taken. |
|
![]() |
|
eriejwg
Music Fan
Joined: 10 June 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 124 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 June 2015 at 9:04pm |
|
Well, THAT makes sense. :)
The second edit is 20.1 seconds in length from point a to point b, not the edit at 20.1 seconds in. Thanks, Ron and Aaron! |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page <12 |
| Tweet |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |