|
Steam - Na Na Hey Hey (2:59 DJ) |
Post Reply 
|
Page 123> |
| Author | |
eriejwg 
Music Fan 
Joined: 10 June 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 73 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply
 Topic: Steam - Na Na Hey Hey (2:59 DJ)Posted: 23 January 2008 at 11:35pm |
|
Curiosity has gotten me again. What are the differences between the 3:43 stock 45 and the 2:59 DJ edit?
|
|
 |
|
|
Hykker
Music Fan
Joined: 30 October 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 24 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 January 2008 at 10:05am |
|
I'm told there are parts in the dj edit that don't exist elsewhere, but to me it just sounds like a couple edits in the bridge and an early fade.
|
|
|
|
|
eriejwg
Music Fan
Joined: 10 June 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 73 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 April 2008 at 8:57am |
|
Spent some time last night recreating this edit. It can be done. Slowed the pitch of the stereo version down about 3%, there were 3 edits as I recall and an early fade.
Thanks to Steve for the original promo edit I could use as my guideline. |
|
|
|
|
Hykker
Music Fan
Joined: 30 October 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 24 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 April 2008 at 4:52pm |
|
I forget who it was that told me that it wasn't possible to re-create the edit from the album version. I did one a few years ago that, while it may not be exactly the same, is virtually indistinguishable from the promo edit (except I didn't fade it quite as fast).
This song just begs to be re-issued commercially with the stereo promo edit. The bridge on the album version is way too long IMHO, and if you find the commercial single version it seems to always be mono. |
|
|
|
|
vanmeter
Music Fan
Joined: 28 December 2005 Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 April 2008 at 6:56pm |
|
I've never heard the promo edit. Does it tighten up the song pretty well?
|
|
|
|
|
MPH711
Music Fan
Joined: 06 April 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 April 2008 at 6:21am |
|
Isn't the DJ edit already on one of the Dick Bartley CD's?
|
|
|
|
|
sriv94
Music Fan
Joined: 16 September 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 April 2008 at 6:58am |
If I'm not mistaken, it's the commercial 45 that's on the Bartley CD. Edited by sriv94 |
|
|
Doug
--------------- All of the good signatures have been taken. |
|
|
|
|
eriejwg
Music Fan
Joined: 10 June 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 73 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 April 2008 at 6:59am |
Not according to the database. |
|
|
|
|
TomDiehl1
Music Fan
Joined: 13 January 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 April 2008 at 7:28pm |
|
Can someone provide me with a copy of the mono DJ edit?
Thanks to John Gallagher for providing me with his stereo dj edit version. Edited by TomDiehl1 |
|
|
Live in stereo.
|
|
|
|
|
Yah Shure
Music Fan
Joined: 11 December 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 April 2008 at 7:41pm |
|
My copy of the out-of-print Vol. 3 Bartley CD just arrived, and it contains the commercial 45 version, not the DJ 45 edit. Actual time is 3:44.
UPDATE: I should add that I never compared the Bartley track to the actual 45, so if they aren't the same, I apologize for any confusion. I should have just said that the track was not the DJ 45 edit. Edited by Yah Shure |
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
Page 123> |
| Tweet |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Topic Options
MPH711 wrote: