![]() |
Tubular Bells 45 version |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 3456> |
Author | |
Steve Carras ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 29 July 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Found this on YouTube. THE original single version according to what it says, and what I remember
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gP9bCkmykAs Edited by Steve Carras |
|
You know you're really older when you think that younger singer Jesse McCartney's related in anyway to former Beatle Paul McCartney.
|
|
![]() |
|
Steve Carras ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 29 July 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Just looking at all of this, and listening to my mp3 (from SoulSeek) of what says "Have a Nice Day", but the version fits the description of the 45 (the sequence mentioned at 1:27 of HAND (Have a Nice Day) IS at 1:27 of this particular file, no 0:18 keyboard sequence, but in my last post here, I posted a YouTube link that DOES have the right edit, or so it claims, maybe I better email for the right version.....:)) |
|
You know you're really older when you think that younger singer Jesse McCartney's related in anyway to former Beatle Paul McCartney.
|
|
![]() |
|
jimct ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 07 April 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Steve, I just listened to the video of the "purported" single edit. The editor's
skills aren't nearly as advanced as many of the editors here, and something does sound "funky" with the audio used on there, but the guy has the basic edits correct. I saw your comment today on the video, and I think I know what's confusing you here. You obtained an mp3 from a source that *claims* it includes the Have A Nice Day CD version. I assure you that is bad information. It is very risky to believe such claims. If you know what to listen for, the HAND version and the 1974 45v are not really all that similar. I am shooting you out the 45v, so you can finally close the book on this one for yourself. |
|
![]() |
|
Steve Carras ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 29 July 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I got it....it actually matches what I had, except the guitar solo starts a bit earlier on my mp3 and just after 2:00 on yours..thanks.
|
|
You know you're really older when you think that younger singer Jesse McCartney's related in anyway to former Beatle Paul McCartney.
|
|
![]() |
|
Santi Paradoa ![]() Music Fan ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 February 2009 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 26 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It may have taken forty plus years, but per Pat the 45 version of this instrumental is on the recent various artists release Now That's What I Call Halloween.
|
|
Santi Paradoa
Miami, Florida |
|
![]() |
|
aaronk ![]() Admin Group ![]() Joined: 16 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 166 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
For anyone interested in the non-hit 7:30 promo 45 version, it can be edited from the 25-minute LP version. Here are instructions starting with Virgin 90589 (the only CD in Pat's database with the full 25:28 version):
- Delete 0:00 to 17:04.505. - With what you have left, copy 0:00.693 to 0:03.456. - Paste the copied segment onto the beginning of the file. - With what you have remaining, remove 7:32.5 to the end. - Fade out from 7:22 to 7:32. |
|
![]() |
|
aaronk ![]() Admin Group ![]() Joined: 16 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 166 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
As a matter of fact, this promo CD does contain the proper US 7" edit with two differences: 1) The promo CD runs about 1.5% faster, and 2) The promo CD fades slightly later than the 45. I have a theory as to why this is. It's possible there is a lower generation tape that contains the proper 45 edit but without the ending (which is repeated from the intro). The promo CD single has the ending starting just a hair later than the actual US 45, so perhaps a lower source tape was used and then the intro re-attached to the ending to complete the song. This would also explain the later fade. |
|
![]() |
|
aaronk ![]() Admin Group ![]() Joined: 16 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 166 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Also, a Mike Oldfield collector says that the version on Have A Nice Day Vol. 23 is the same edit as found on the 1987 promo CD A Virgin Compilation.
|
|
![]() |
|
Tom Daly ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 20 October 2017 Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Didn't anyone notice? The REAL issue with the Rhino CD is that the LP version was simply edited to approximate the edits on the 45, but the 7" single contained dynamic compression, for which there was no need on the LP. Without the compression, you can't possibly have the 45 version, no matter how you edit the album version!
|
|
![]() |
|
aaronk ![]() Admin Group ![]() Joined: 16 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 166 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
You're right that there is a slight amount of dynamic range compression on the 45, but there are varying degrees of dynamic compression on all kinds of CDs. The most extreme example is brickwalling. Sure, you could make an argument that because more compression was added to one version or another, it's not exactly the same as what may have appeared on the vinyl. Overall, though, the amount of compression added to the "Tubular Bells" 45 is not enough to give it a totally different sound. It's definitely the same mix on both the LP and 45.
|
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 3456> |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |