|
"Breaking Us in Two" - Joe Jackson |
Post Reply 
|
Page 12> |
| Author | |
Todd Ireland 
Music Fan 
Joined: 16 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 23 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply
 Topic: "Breaking Us in Two" - Joe JacksonPosted: 21 May 2005 at 1:29pm |
|
Does anyone know if a DJ edit exists for Joe Jackson's "Breaking Us in Two"? The 10th edition doesn't mention anything about one, but I seem to recall hearing a shorter version on the radio than the one I'm accustomed to seeing on CD running 4:47-4:52.
|
|
 |
|
|
sriv94
Music Fan
Joined: 16 September 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 November 2005 at 11:10am |
|
I'm sure a shorter version also exists (one that edits out everything from the second line of the instrumental break to the final "Could we be much closer if we tried" line). I remember it being played on AT40 back in the day.
|
|
|
Doug
--------------- All of the good signatures have been taken. |
|
|
|
|
Todd Ireland
Music Fan
Joined: 16 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 23 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 01 May 2006 at 9:52pm |
|
Attention, jimct:
You mentioned in a previous thread that you specialize in DJ promo 45s. Do you have a DJ 45 of Joe Jackson's "Breaking Us in Two" and, if so, could you tell us what is the actual run time on your copy? Thanks much, and welcome to the message board! |
|
|
|
|
AndrewChouffi
Music Fan
Joined: 24 September 2005 Status: Offline Points: 44 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 01 May 2006 at 10:34pm |
|
I own the domestic USA promo 45, but I don't have time to listen to it right now.
One side is labelled 4:57 (album version). Other side is labelled 3:48 (edited version). Andy |
|
|
|
|
jimct
Music Fan
Joined: 07 April 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 01 May 2006 at 10:57pm |
|
Thanks, Todd for the welcome - right in my wheelhouse...since Andy just posted the correct listed DJ 45 times, I will simply add that the (3:48) short side is a rarity, in that the actual run time is just (3:42).
Edited by jimct |
|
|
|
|
Grant
Music Fan
Joined: 12 October 2004 Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 May 2006 at 2:02am |
|
That edit should be a snap to recreate from the LP version. It cuts out most of the instrumental break in the middle.
|
|
|
|
|
Pat Downey
Admin Group
Joined: 01 October 2003 Status: Offline Points: 1 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 May 2006 at 5:54am |
|
Jim, could you time the long version of this song on your dj copy as my commercial copy runs (4:46) not (4:57) as stated on the record label.
Edited by Pat Downey |
|
|
|
|
jimct
Music Fan
Joined: 07 April 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 May 2006 at 9:25am |
|
Pat: When my long DJ timing of "Breaking Us In Two" came in at (4:44), I was surprised that those last 3 seconds weren't there. To be sure, I stop-watched it a second time, making sure I got EVERY milli-second of fade (which I always try to do anyway.) Nope, it's definitely (4:44). Just reporting the facts... (PS - deadwax says "A&M-AM-02510A-Long - P1")
Edited by jimct |
|
|
|
|
sriv94
Music Fan
Joined: 16 September 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 May 2006 at 11:35am |
I agree, but I always thought the edit sounded awkward. You could've made a better edit by just excising the instrumental break and bridge and verse leading up to it. I may try that--one of these days (of course, I'd also have to try to create the edit as it actually was as well). :) |
|
|
Doug
--------------- All of the good signatures have been taken. |
|
|
|
|
Todd Ireland
Music Fan
Joined: 16 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 23 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 May 2006 at 1:32pm |
I've seen a number of cases in the database where the DJ copies of a song may differ from its commercial 45 release by several seconds. Sounds like this may be such a case with "Breaking Us in Two". Thanks for helping solve another mystery, guys! |
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
| Tweet |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Topic Options
Grant wrote: