![]() |
England Dan/John Ford Coley-Well Never.. |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 12> |
Author | |
jimct ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 07 April 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 28 April 2008 at 11:13am |
My commercial 45 has a listed time of (2:49), but an actual time of (2:44).
|
|
![]() |
|
sriv94 ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 16 September 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Is the 45 sped (I seem to recall the pitch on the version I heard on the radio being a little faster than the CD versions I've heard)?
Edited by sriv94 |
|
Doug
--------------- All of the good signatures have been taken. |
|
![]() |
|
edtop40 ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 29 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 7 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
my commercial 45 for the england dan & john ford coley song "we'll never have to say goodbye again" issued as big tree 16110 states the run time on the label as 2:49 and does indeed run 2:49 and is identical to the version from the below cd...the run-out groove etching is "st-bt-34730-1"....jim, does your's match mine?
(S) (2:49) Rhino 399164 Very Best Of |
|
edtop40
|
|
![]() |
|
sriv94 ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 16 September 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Did we ever figure out if there's a speed difference or if there are two
different 45 pressings? My recollection continues to be that the CD versions run slower than the 45. |
|
Doug
--------------- All of the good signatures have been taken. |
|
![]() |
|
sriv94 ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 16 September 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sorry to threadbump, but I'd still like to know this. Is the (2:44) version sped-up compared to the (2:49) version, or is it an early fade? (Or possibly both?)
|
|
Doug
--------------- All of the good signatures have been taken. |
|
![]() |
|
jimct ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 07 April 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Man, if I had a quarter for every time Ed and I have come up with different
actual timings over the years, despite identical deadwax info, I could sure buy myself a lot more 45's!!! :( And then being called on to later defend my timings, and refute contrary, after-my-report info submitted by Ed, yet again, always puts me in a great mood....(Can anyone say "Jim Root Canal?") Nonetheless, I press on here, in the name of ultimate accuracy. My stock 45, which debuted on BB on 2/25/78 and I bought just 3 days after its debut week, again has a listed time of (2:49), and again has an actual time of (2:44). Deadwax info for this copy is "ST-BT-34730-10 1-1". I also pulled my stereo/stereo Big Tree 16110 promo 45. It is unusual for this era that it does not feature a mono/stereo configuration. One stereo promo 45 side matches Ed's deadwax info exactly: "ST-BT-34730-1", while the other side's deadwax is "ST-BT-34730-2". Both sides have listed times of (2:49), and actual times of (2:47). No more. No less. (2:47). As Doug has correctly pointed out, the (2:49) CD versions clearly sound "slow" to me, compared to both my 1978 radio memories or either of the 45 versions I just played/re-timed. To my ears just now, my stock 45 copy's ending seconds clearly truncates *much* more severely than either side of my promo 45 did. When time allows, I will forward dubs of both my stock & promo 45 versions to my usual experts, as I think there's at least a chance that the two versions' last (1:00) or so may contain some edit point differences between them. Edited by jimct |
|
![]() |
|
thecdguy ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 14 August 2019 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 21 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
For those who may not have known, around the time this song was released as a single, another version by Maureen McGovern was released but failed to chart and apparently wasn't on an album. I assume that's the reason why it's never been on any of her compilations and most likely has never seen the light of day on CD. However, Maureen's version is on YouTube (from vinyl, of course) so for anyone who might be interested, here it is.
Maureen McGovern - We'll Never Have To Say Goodbye Again |
|
Dan In Philly
|
|
![]() |
|
MPH711 ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 06 April 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The First charting version by Deardorff & Joseph was played in
Chicago on WBBM-FM. It charted a year and a half prior to the England Dan version. I see it bubbled under at #109 in Billboard but hit #22 on the Easy Listening charts. https://youtu.be/XIlyOkUNlo0 Edited by MPH711 |
|
![]() |
|
eriejwg ![]() Music Fan ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 June 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 84 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I just found a video of a commercial 45 being played on a
Technics 1200. The 45 runs 2:47. With Jim's commercial 45 running 2:44, promo 45 running 2:47 and Ed's 45 running 2:49 I'd say there were different pressings. |
|
![]() |
|
davidclark ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 17 November 2004 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 29 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It was originally recorded by its writer, Jeffrey Comanor, on his 1976 LP "A
Rumor in His Own Time". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U3iYtzjifOQ |
|
dc1
|
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 12> |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |